Mark - TheBlue said:Nasri and Silva is overkill they have the same properties as players so can't really compliment each other. Silva is better and if he was playing with a different player preferably someone with pace who he can play into dangerous positions and that player can in turn use his pace and ability to get past his man and create, even just using his speed to be played into a 1 on 1 situation.
But because they are so Similar its Silva to Nasri who turns and gives it backwards. Both good players just feels like both of them on the same team isn't needed.
Show me one video of Nasri giving a through ball half the quality of Silva vs Everton or United last season. Wherever, Marseille, Arsenal or Here.
I'm getting sick of repeating this but these excuses are too much too bear. NASRI IS NOT SIMILAR TO SILVA. NASRI IS A BETTER WINGER THAN PLAYMAKER (how sh*t he may be as a winger, he's even more as a playmaker). HE NEVER HAS PLAYED PLAYMAKER IN ANY CLUB HE WAS IN (winger at Arsenal, busquets type 6 at Marseille).
Why do the fanboys not admit that he has bad performances at his best position? Do you really want to waste two more years on trying Nasri as a playmaker, after wasting two of them on Nasri the winger?
I read above a comment saying Milner is prefered because he's English, well, if there ever was an ethnic element involved, it would much more be in favour of Nasri than Milner. I don't see the necessity to elaborate on that but everyone can understand my point.