Deepest Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2010
- Messages
- 10,357
Maybe the Swansea Chairman should look to his first team coach if he wants to know who is telling the press that it's virtually a done deal.
moomba said:Exactly.
moomba said:He's also complaining about the time taken to get the deal done, leaving them little time to get a replacement.
He seems to think we have a responsibility to help them get the best deal for their club possible.
moomba said:He's also complaining about the time taken to get the deal done, leaving them little time to get a replacement.
He seems to think we have a responsibility to help them get the best deal for their club possible.
alky313 said:moomba said:He's also complaining about the time taken to get the deal done, leaving them little time to get a replacement.
He seems to think we have a responsibility to help them get the best deal for their club possible.
In all honesty it is in our best nature to do things professionally and quickly for the future. If we truly want a player it shouldn't be because he was a great deal at the time... But a tremendous addition for the future. Clubs should want to do business with us for the financial aspect but as well as the professional aspect.
The situation now is that if two teams bid 20m for a player and one of them is City... The selling club is likely to fuck us over for the sake of it.
We should have wrapped this deal up two weeks ago.
moomba said:I hope we wait until 23.59 Friday night now, cause you can be sure that they're just as keen to get some money in for him now while they can as we are of getting the player in.
Neville Kneville said:dctid said:Blue Haze said:This was posted in the It's Quiet thread
Hope we have a Plan B in case this goes tits up.
Based upon what we have seen so far its very fucking unlikely
Very unlikely Sinclair is plan A.
blue12 said:Let's be honest here would anybody be gutted if this didn't happen,reckon at best sinclair is plan c.
Walk away city and leave Swansea with a pissed off player with 12 months left before he is on a free.
moomba said:alky313 said:moomba said:He's also complaining about the time taken to get the deal done, leaving them little time to get a replacement.
He seems to think we have a responsibility to help them get the best deal for their club possible.
In all honesty it is in our best nature to do things professionally and quickly for the future. If we truly want a player it shouldn't be because he was a great deal at the time... But a tremendous addition for the future. Clubs should want to do business with us for the financial aspect but as well as the professional aspect.
The situation now is that if two teams bid 20m for a player and one of them is City... The selling club is likely to fuck us over for the sake of it.
We should have wrapped this deal up two weeks ago.
We shouldn't be forced to do a deal on their terms. I'm sure we'd love to finalise the deal as early as possible, but if they're not willing to sell at a price we're willing to buy at then it's just too bad. We shouldn't be the club that has to blink first every time.
I hope we wait until 23.59 Friday night now, cause you can be sure that they're just as keen to get some money in for him now while they can as we are of getting the player in.
Rammy Blue said:moomba said:I hope we wait until 23.59 Friday night now, cause you can be sure that they're just as keen to get some money in for him now while they can as we are of getting the player in.
We'd be 59 mins too late....
Rammy Blue said:moomba said:I hope we wait until 23.59 Friday night now, cause you can be sure that they're just as keen to get some money in for him now while they can as we are of getting the player in.
We'd be 59 mins too late....
alky313 said:If Swansea are asking a set amount... They shouldn't have to lower their price either. We also shouldn't be forcing anyone's hand in the eleventh hour either. We were once a club of Swansea's stature. For us Scott Sinclair is a plan B but there are few players of his value available on the market with the proper wages.
This is a club who has sent out Joe Allen, Sygurdsson and co. If we can't get a deal done for winger they haven't even started yet this season then there are questions to be asked here.
alky313 said:moomba said:alky313 said:In all honesty it is in our best nature to do things professionally and quickly for the future. If we truly want a player it shouldn't be because he was a great deal at the time... But a tremendous addition for the future. Clubs should want to do business with us for the financial aspect but as well as the professional aspect.
The situation now is that if two teams bid 20m for a player and one of them is City... The selling club is likely to fuck us over for the sake of it.
We should have wrapped this deal up two weeks ago.
We shouldn't be forced to do a deal on their terms. I'm sure we'd love to finalise the deal as early as possible, but if they're not willing to sell at a price we're willing to buy at then it's just too bad. We shouldn't be the club that has to blink first every time.
I hope we wait until 23.59 Friday night now, cause you can be sure that they're just as keen to get some money in for him now while they can as we are of getting the player in.
If Swansea are asking a set amount... They shouldn't have to lower their price either. We also shouldn't be forcing anyone's hand in the eleventh hour either. We were once a club of Swansea's stature. For us Scott Sinclair is a plan B but there are few players of his value available on the market with the proper wages.
This is a club who has sent out Joe Allen, Sygurdsson and co. If we can't get a deal done for winger they haven't even started yet this season then there are questions to be asked here.