so this agenda thing.

[dom]

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B81cOoY7dYg&feature=youtu.be[/video]

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EiHwSOHYGc[/video]

The knowing look

Sorry for my ignorance..
Who's the blonde ?

 

[Deleted member 58678]

ultimately if we are good enough we will beat them in anycase and the safety net of pot 1 will be reached

Just in time for UEFA to change the rules.

correct.

if the rags dont make it again this year they will change the rules or throw some poor country out, not a club, a country.

That's quite a remarkably ridiculous comment to make. I don't know for sure but I think you're just a complete and utter WUM. But if your aren't and you actually believe that shite then I think you need to shut the door on football and look for another interest because you're barmy!

 

[bluegoal]

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B81cOoY7dYg&feature=youtu.be[/video]

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EiHwSOHYGc[/video]

The knowing look

Sorry for my ignorance..
Who's the blonde ?

Vicky Kloss i think..

 

[Thebigbluehouse]

Just looked at our talksport predictor league. Out of twenty odd teams, only the team's with a ushited badge next to their names have been processed. So now, anyone supporting another team are below all ushited fans in the table. That's what I call a sky agenda.

 

[blue dallas]

Any of you are still stupid enough to think the media don't have an agenda against city
I suggest u look at the headline page after tonight's 'champions ' league draw on
Sky sports football app .

2 story's on l'pool
1 on arsenal
1 on Chelsea
Not 1 headline on the champions city

How many times do the same points have to be made? A media bias that reflects fan numbers to gain more hits / sell more papers is not an agenda against us.

Yesterday on the same page we were champions again , and headliners.
'stoke stun the champions'

Yet no mention of us after 'champions league ' draw .

I rest my case

 

[MaxCityBlue]

Here's one for you: the Stoke lad Diouf scored the winner against us yesterday. However, all I've heard from the broadcasting media is "the ex ManU player scores against the champions Manchester City". Yet, and here it comes, when Jack Rodwell scored against the rags not ONCE was it mentioned that the Ex Manchester City player put one past the Scum. What's interesting is that it wasn't as though Jack was a City player six or seven years ago (hence the press had forgotten he played for us) he'd only just left us and it was his first game in a Sunderland shirt.

 

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

Here's one for you: the Stoke lad Diouf scored the winner against us yesterday. However, all I've heard from the broadcasting media is "the ex ManU player scores against the champions Manchester City". Yet, and here it comes, when Jack Rodwell scored against the rags not ONCE was it mentioned that the Ex Manchester City player put one past the Scum. What's interesting is that it wasn't as though Jack was a City player six or seven years ago (hence the press had forgotten he played for us) he'd only just left us and it was his first game in a Sunderland shirt.

Lots of people said that he was a former Manchester City player.

 

[MaxCityBlue]

Here's another one: if it was Mangala that didn't have a work permit and by extension was unable to register with the FA do you think we may have heard about it by now? The press and broadcasting media would be on it like a fly on ..... well the rags I guess. Scum's new player Rojo not only doesn't have a work permit but he's embroiled in 3rd party ownership and is therefore unable to register with the FA. I haven't heard much about this from Sky Sports News have you?

 

[MaxCityBlue]

Here's one for you: the Stoke lad Diouf scored the winner against us yesterday. However, all I've heard from the broadcasting media is "the ex ManU player scores against the champions Manchester City". Yet, and here it comes, when Jack Rodwell scored against the rags not ONCE was it mentioned that the Ex Manchester City player put one past the Scum. What's interesting is that it wasn't as though Jack was a City player six or seven years ago (hence the press had forgotten he played for us) he'd only just left us and it was his first game in a Sunderland shirt.

Lots of people said that he was a former Manchester City player.

Who? Sky didn't. Match of the day didn't. It wasn't mentioned during the commentary. Also what relevance does a player who played for the rags ages ago have to do with Manchester City? Rodwell has only just left our club and yet not a bloody dicky bird.

 

[Deleted member 58678]

Here's another one: if it was Mangala that didn't have a work permit and by extension was unable to register with the FA do you think we may have heard about it by now? The press and broadcasting media would be on it like a fly on ..... well the rags I guess. Scum's new player Rojo not only doesn't have a work permit but he's embroiled in 3rd party ownership and is therefore unable to register with the FA. I haven't heard much about this from Sky Sports News have you?

It's been in the media for five days, with the Mail running a story on it five days ago and a story as recent as yesterday from the Independent.

Did you also miss the one that talked about him bottling a neighbour too?