so this agenda thing.

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Any of you are still stupid enough to think the media don't have an agenda against city
I suggest u look at the headline page after tonight's 'champions ' league draw on
Sky sports football app .

2 story's on l'pool
1 on arsenal
1 on Chelsea
Not 1 headline on the champions city

How many times do the same points have to be made? A media bias that reflects fan numbers to gain more hits / sell more papers is not an agenda against us.

Yesterday on the same page we were champions again , and headliners.
'stoke stun the champions'

Yet no mention of us after 'champions league ' draw .

I rest my case

We are only the champions when we suffer a reverse!

 

[ped]

Mario this ,Mario that,when he was at city he was the devil incarnate

 

[Deleted member 58678]

How many times do the same points have to be made? A media bias that reflects fan numbers to gain more hits / sell more papers is not an agenda against us.

Yesterday on the same page we were champions again , and headliners.
'stoke stun the champions'

Yet no mention of us after 'champions league ' draw .

I rest my case

We are only the champions when we suffer a reverse!

As I was leaving the house for the game yesterday, Football Focus had a look back at Monday's game and introduced it as "now to the game on Monday night where the Champions beat last season's runners-up" and went on to talk about us playing really well.

 

[Deleted member 58678]

Mario this ,Mario that,when he was at city he was the devil incarnate

They've talked about his mental state and off field antics more than his game today.

I find it odd what people pick up on and what they don't. There've been some very over sensitive things posted about in the last two pages.

 

[ped]

Mario this ,Mario that,when he was at city he was the devil incarnate

They've talked about his mental state and off field antics more than his game today.

I find it odd what people pick up on and what they don't. There've been some very over sensitive things posted about in the last two pages.

for every positive,report/comment,there are 3/4 negatives,they (the establishment,and media,dont like or respect us,for every 50/50 decision a ref gives us ,there are 3/4 given the otherway,some people may see it differently,thats ok,but I know thousands of city fans,will agree ,maybe its the wacky that was consumed on the kippax in the 70s and 80s ,or maybe we just see it for what it is

 

[cookster]

Mario this ,Mario that,when he was at city he was the devil incarnate

Noticed that myself. Now he plays for Dippershit he's a God.

 

[Blue Is the Opposite of Blue]

Here's one for you: the Stoke lad Diouf scored the winner against us yesterday. However, all I've heard from the broadcasting media is "the ex ManU player scores against the champions Manchester City". Yet, and here it comes, when Jack Rodwell scored against the rags not ONCE was it mentioned that the Ex Manchester City player put one past the Scum. What's interesting is that it wasn't as though Jack was a City player six or seven years ago (hence the press had forgotten he played for us) he'd only just left us and it was his first game in a Sunderland shirt.

Lots of people said that he was a former Manchester City player.

Who? Sky didn't. Match of the day didn't. It wasn't mentioned during the commentary. Also what relevance does a player who played for the rags ages ago have to do with Manchester City? Rodwell has only just left our club and yet not a bloody dicky bird.

That's your fault for not hearing it. I've heard it mentioned lots of times.

 

[Bill]

Mario this ,Mario that,when he was at city he was the devil incarnate

Noticed that myself. Now he plays for Dippershit he's a God.

laughable how obvious it is.

 

[George Hannah]

Mario this ,Mario that,when he was at city he was the devil incarnate

Noticed that myself. Now he plays for Dippershit he's a God.

laughable how obvious it is.

equally the media celebration of the lumpen Stokies

and here's a bit of pulp bursting with bias

Manchester City unlikely to make deadline day move for Radamel Falcao
Aug 31, 2014 17:09 By David McDonnell

The Premier League holders are also struggling to offload the injured Alvaro Negredo who is likely to be omitted from the Champions League squad

Manchester City are unlikely to make a deadline day move for Monaco striker Radamel Falcao.
City had considered a move for the Colombia striker, but only if they managed to offload Alvaro Negredo.
But despite the latter's current injury struggles, its believed they won't pursue a move for Falcao - particularly considering the £20million loan fee that Monaco are after - with him still at the club.
With Negredo, Edin Dzeko, Sergio Aguero and Stevan Jovetic among their ranks City aren't keen on bringing in a fifth forward, without the guarantee of someone leaving; and the only player they would allow to leave is the former Sevilla man.

Moreover, Falcao is believed to prefer a move to Real Madrid, having tweeted - then deleted - a tweet seemingly confirming a move to the Santiago Bernabeu was on the cards.

 

[Blueknows]

Mario this ,Mario that,when he was at city he was the devil incarnate

MOTD 2 panel discussing what a positive impact Marios signing has had on liverpool...then quote " all the negativity surrounding Mario was down to his relationship with Mancini"