so this agenda thing.

[Shirley]

I do wish posters would desist from spelling 'united' with an upper case 'U'.

Should be an upper case 'R' every time.



Rags

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I do wish posters would desist from spelling 'united' with an upper case 'U'.

Should be an upper case 'R' every time.



Rags

Lower case 'r', mate.

Every time.

 

[Shirley]

I do wish posters would desist from spelling 'united' with an upper case 'U'.

Should be an upper case 'R' every time.



Rags

Lower case 'r', mate.

Every time.

Do you know if you use the word rags upper case or lower in the football section of the Daily Telegraph the word is automatically moderated.

And they bang on about history.

 

[CelesteItis]

What about ∩nited

and start a campaign for media usage when spouting bias according their agenda.

 

[citymad]

I do wish posters would desist from spelling 'united' with an upper case 'U'.

Should be an upper case 'R' every time.



Rags

Lower case 'r', mate.

Every time.

I'd feel dirty even if i typed the u word never mind what bloody case it should be. rags or worse every time.

 

[Bill]

You were caught. Tough.

I wasn't caught trying to do anything. United have named a homegrown (I'll say English if it helps you, matey) - or academy produced - player in every squad they've given to the Premier League in the last 3,075 games they've played.

That is absolutely fair enough even if they didn't name an academy produced player in that one game against Arsenal. I'm sure one game out of 3,075 isn't enough to justify a whole media campaign questioning whether they do give the same kind of support to English and young players anymore.

Personally I think they've got to stop supporting English players that aren't good enough, like Welbeck and Cleverley and the like, simply because they are academy products of theirs. It's allowed their squad to grow stale while sentimentality clouded their vision. Replacing Welbeck and Cleverley with Di Maria and Blind is good business.

I don't even care that much really, I just think it's sad that you've allowed anything about United to rule your life so much that you get this animated about it.

I take it you're not on nodding terms with irony.

pmsl.

 

[Thenumber1blue]

I always knew there was some kind of agenda but is this true ?
<a class="postlink" href="http://typicalcity.org/2014/09/15/david-mooney-is-there-an-anti-manchester-city-media-agenda/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://typicalcity.org/2014/09/15/david ... ia-agenda/</a>?

 

[Newman Noggs]

I always knew there was some kind of agenda but is this true ?
<a class="postlink" href="http://typicalcity.org/2014/09/15/david-mooney-is-there-an-anti-manchester-city-media-agenda/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://typicalcity.org/2014/09/15/david ... ia-agenda/</a>?

Hardly the sharpest use of irony and not very original. Simply an extended "agenda thread" post.

 

[Bewar3them00n]

For an example, those who read the Guardian will all know Jamie Jackson, and his less than subtle love of. Man utd, but check out his latest oozing.....

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/sep/15/manchester-united-daley-blind-qpr?commentpage=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/football/blo ... mentpage=1</a>

One win, and suddenly it's all ok

 

[bluesoup]

For an example, those who read the Guardian will all know Jamie Jackson, and his less than subtle love of. Man utd, but check out his latest oozing.....

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/sep/15/manchester-united-daley-blind-qpr?commentpage=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.theguardian.com/football/blo ... mentpage=1</a>

no thanks, not interested in articles like these if they ooze subtle love for united. It's just more click money to the papers that wrote them!