so this agenda thing.

Status
Not open for further replies.
everythingchangesbutblue said:
Makes me laugh when the ostriches use a handfull of examples to try and prove no agenda when all they do is ignore 100s upon 100s of examples that cleary show a trend. Funny as fuck but i suppose their all "clear and balanced" haha.

Or fail to mention that their goal just 10 minutes earlier was also offside, despite the TV coverage just brushing over it and only showing it once saying he's level. It was only marginal but then again so was Kun but we see that over and over again.
 
fatbloke said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
Makes me laugh when the ostriches use a handfull of examples to try and prove no agenda when all they do is ignore 100s upon 100s of examples that cleary show a trend. Funny as fuck but i suppose their all "clear and balanced" haha.

Or fail to mention that their goal just 10 minutes earlier was also offside, despite the TV coverage just brushing over it and only showing it once saying he's level. It was only marginal but then again so was Kun but we see that over and over again.
The qpr goal was onside but they are guilty of what you accuse them of, ignoring the overwhelming evidence of examples but jumping on 1 or 2 examples of their own, ofcourse with just the right amount of superiority and increduality. You can't have it both ways ostriches.
 
everythingchangesbutblue said:
fatbloke said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
Makes me laugh when the ostriches use a handfull of examples to try and prove no agenda when all they do is ignore 100s upon 100s of examples that cleary show a trend. Funny as fuck but i suppose their all "clear and balanced" haha.

Or fail to mention that their goal just 10 minutes earlier was also offside, despite the TV coverage just brushing over it and only showing it once saying he's level. It was only marginal but then again so was Kun but we see that over and over again.
The qpr goal was onside but they are guilty of what you accuse them of, ignoring the overwhelming evidence of examples but jumping on 1 or 2 examples of their own, ofcourse with just the right amount of superiority and increduality. You can't have it both ways ostriches.

just for clarity, are you saying referees are explicitly told by their bosses(under instruction from some smoky corridor somewhere) to not give decisions to us and to give decisions to our oppos whenever they can.

i assume that's what you are implying
 
fatbloke said:
everythingchangesbutblue said:
Makes me laugh when the ostriches use a handfull of examples to try and prove no agenda when all they do is ignore 100s upon 100s of examples that cleary show a trend. Funny as fuck but i suppose their all "clear and balanced" haha.

Or fail to mention that their goal just 10 minutes earlier was also offside, despite the TV coverage just brushing over it and only showing it once saying he's level. It was only marginal but then again so was Kun but we see that over and over again.

shhh, let them keep their heads in the sand.
 
The cookie monster said:
cookster said:
Aint it funny that on RAWK and Sad Cafe they think there is an agenda against them...
Every club going mate, and every forum think they are hard done by..............
Go and have a look at Arsenal, Southampton and Newcastle's forums too.
 
Bert Trautmann's Parachute said:
jimmygrimblesboots said:
can anyone explain why twitchers lad despises us so much ? Perhaps Louise is getting her back doors smashed in by a city fan ? , He really does have issues with our club , and he appears to revelling in our current plight.
And yet he's on our end-of-season DVD.
That's because City are part of the agenda against themselves!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.