so this agenda thing.

Status
Not open for further replies.
de niro said:
Chippy_boy said:
de niro said:
this.

at first they would pat us on the head and say things like "not in my life time". now that patronising manner has turned to acute fear.

love it.

What I don't understand is why are Chelsea not subjected to the same abuse we get? In the early Abramovic days they were spending money like water and blowing everyone away in the transfer market. Any perceived threat to the established dominance of the scum, arsenal and liverpool was soon real threat when they did the league double.

But throughout all of that (and still to this day) they don't come in for the constant bile directed at us. Whether its anti-Arab racism, or what I have no idea, but it's markedly different from how the press have treated Chelsea.

its the rags mate, simple as that. we have hurt their cash cow more than anyone else could have done. we being in Manchester also gets their goat up. when "Manchester" united are beamed, sold, displayed, whored round the world we now piggy back that.

and I fucking love it.

When Sal on BBC Breakfast mentioned the Scum Southampton game in the middle of our Academy launch feature, I have to admit it got my goat a bit. But on the other hand, hearing her refer to them as "the other Manchester team" did at the same time make me smile :-)
 
kinkladz-ade said:
hutton who blue said:
Proper officiating would have granted Man City an instant free kick when Aguero was fouled early on against Everton and he wouldn't have injured himself stretching for the ball.
Jealous rag fuckwits purporting to be blues on this forum are becoming ever less frequent on this particular thread because of the overwhelming evidence supporting an agenda against Man City so instead make snide, cowardly unsupported remarks on other threads. You jealous rag fuckwits are ostensibly noticeable. Give it up.

This is definately a Clarkie


Ha ha maybe.
Though some people don't hesitate to speak their minds,because they have nothing to lose.
 
City1974 said:
The bias\anti-city, if we agree that it is in place amongst certain media people (and even trying to be as neutral as possible, there is definitely anti-City rhetoric there), when did this start ?

When we won the Title in 2012 I could not say I noticed any significant bias, just many people enjoying (apart from Trafford Rangers fans and the gritted teeth congratulation of Alex Ferguson) a great finish to a season.

In 2013 when we finished 2nd did it start then, or was it in the main from the start of last season and FFP gaining prominence in the media as a story, and then the media fawning over Liverpool, and now the love in with Van Gaal Bladder and the resurgence of Trafford ?

Or has it been there since Sept 2008 and then after that with such as trying to sign Kaka for close to £ 100 million?

What was the main trigger for the nonsense\bile from the media ?
Rodgers has rather more quality to call upon, with the team that should have won the title last season. (pause for laughter ) after playing the best football in the country (Oh my sides ) still largely intact.
He will point to that, when they took apart the likes of Manchester City,(Specsavers) Manchester United and Arsenal with the most exhilarating form shown in two decades. David Maddock.............Daily Mirror.
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/11283101/Jose-Mourinho-If-Chelsea-dont-bring-young-players-through-then-we-should-close-our-academy.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... ademy.html</a>
 
Fallingbostel Blue said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/11283101/Jose-Mourinho-If-Chelsea-dont-bring-young-players-through-then-we-should-close-our-academy.html
Good article that. Sounds like he's putting a shot across the bows of the blokes in their academy.
 
Fallingbostel Blue said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/11283101/Jose-Mourinho-If-Chelsea-dont-bring-young-players-through-then-we-should-close-our-academy.html
God, I enjoyed that.
The opening of the academy must be really hurting them!
 
Chippy_boy said:
de niro said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
As soon as we were perceived as a genuine threat.

this.

at first they would pat us on the head and say things like "not in my life time". now that patronising manner has turned to acute fear.

love it.

What I don't understand is why are Chelsea not subjected to the same abuse we get? In the early Abramovic days they were spending money like water and blowing everyone away in the transfer market. Any perceived threat to the established dominance of the scum, arsenal and liverpool was soon real threat when they did the league double.

But throughout all of that (and still to this day) they don't come in for the constant bile directed at us. Whether its anti-Arab racism, or what I have no idea, but it's markedly different from how the press have treated Chelsea.

Chelsea didn't upset the apple cart. Abramovich took over in the summer of 2003 and in the majority of seasons before that, the top four was made up of United, Arsenal, usually Liverpool and then one of Leeds, Newcastle and Chelsea themselves. Chelsea getting the big money just established the 'big 4' of them, United, Arsenal and Liverpool which fans of those clubs didn't really mind. Sure they had a new title challenger but they also had the CL almost assured every season and hence plenty of money to bring in flashy players.

City getting big money meant that there were now 5 pegs for 4 holes and that didn't sit well with that 'established elite' as they realised they might not get their UEFA handout every season. I don't think the media were that bad initially when we were competing with Spurs and Liverpool as they didn't have the biggest voices. Last season things started to look shaky for United and Arsenal and that really hit home. For the last 20 years these are clubs who have been around the top every season and now that they're not it's City who've taken their spot.

I personally think we should be applauded for that as it brings back a sense of competition. However, some journalists like to point towards that earned success of United and Arsenal, despite the fact that their money has come through investment and continuous entry to an elite competition through having a monopoly on the domestic game.
 
Chippy_boy said:
de niro said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
As soon as we were perceived as a genuine threat.

this.

at first they would pat us on the head and say things like "not in my life time". now that patronising manner has turned to acute fear.

love it.

What I don't understand is why are Chelsea not subjected to the same abuse we get? In the early Abramovic days they were spending money like water and blowing everyone away in the transfer market. Any perceived threat to the established dominance of the scum, arsenal and liverpool was soon real threat when they did the league double.

But throughout all of that (and still to this day) they don't come in for the constant bile directed at us. Whether its anti-Arab racism, or what I have no idea, but it's markedly different from how the press have treated Chelsea.



Because they are a London club where all the cockroaches have their nest's !!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.