cleavers
Moderator
They won't need to reconfigure the seating as the PL pitch fits perfectly well in the space available.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Spurs’ new stadium
- Thread starter Chris Holmes
- Start date
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,607
- Team supported
- Manchester City
why isn't played at the Etihad as a home game for the spuds, therefore spuds are punished for not finishing on time...... instead City are punished and have to play on a dodge pitch ….
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
why isn't played at the Etihad as a home game for the spuds, therefore spuds are punished for not finishing on time...... instead City are punished and have to play on a dodge pitch ….
The rest of the league would be pointing the finger of us gaining an advantage by having one extra home game.
There was no way round this, apart from Spurs being honest and giving The Football Association sooner notice they needed to use Wembley. The good thing that will come out of this is the spiralling building costs will cripple Spurs for years. How they have acted they deserve it.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,607
- Team supported
- Manchester City
The rest of the league would be pointing the finger of us gaining an advantage by having one extra home game.
There was no way round this, apart from Spurs being honest and giving The Football Association sooner notice they needed to use Wembley. The good thing that will come out of this is the spiralling building costs will cripple Spurs for years. How they have acted they deserve it.
I understand what you are saying but spuds would have the home support we would only have the 3000 away support …...
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,304
Should have played this match at either the Emirates or at West Ham. It’s a joke having to play on a ploughed field.
Should have played this match at either the Emirates or at West Ham. It’s a joke having to play on a ploughed field.
The premier rule says you can’t play at more than 2 grounds.
Abattoir Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Sep 2006
- Messages
- 1,017
The premier rule says you can’t play at more than 2 grounds.
Twickenham?
Interesting. Rule must have come in after Wimbledon/Palace then.
whp.blue
Well-Known Member
Sure there is some sort of Covenant say no football can be played at Twickenham.
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,304
Just had a look at the rules and can’t find that one, just one about it being up to the Premier League board. (Rules K5 and K6). However there is an argument that they are breaking rule K4.2.The premier rule says you can’t play at more than 2 grounds.
K4. No Club shall have or enter into a ground-sharing agreement in respect of its Stadium unless the agreement contains legally enforceable provisions to the effect that:
K.4.1. the playing of the Club’s League Matches at the Stadium shall always take precedence over the activities of the other party to the agreement; and
K.4.2. the Club shall have the ability to postpone other activities scheduled to take place on the pitch in the 48 hours immediately preceding the kick-off of a League Match where, in the reasonable opinion of the Club, there is a risk that such activity might result in the subsequent postponement or abandonment of the League Match.
Twickenham?
Interesting. Rule must have come in after Wimbledon/Palace then.
Why they played at 2 different clubs in one season?