Spurs (A) Post Match Thread

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by MCFC1993, 2 Feb 2020.

  1. stonerblue

    stonerblue

    Joined:
    23 May 2004
    Messages:
    24,897
    Location:
    Still alive here....
    You tell her mate.
     
  2. Indaparkside

    Indaparkside

    Joined:
    28 Dec 2015
    Messages:
    8,011
    No shit Einstein
     
  3. Big Swifty

    Big Swifty

    Joined:
    8 Nov 2011
    Messages:
    2,520
    Terrible news coming in about the Titanic.
     
  4. jimmygrimblesboots

    jimmygrimblesboots

    Joined:
    17 Aug 2014
    Messages:
    8,062
    Location:
    parallel universe
    Landing on the moon , that's some achievement !!!
     
  5. NZBlue

    NZBlue

    Joined:
    26 May 2004
    Messages:
    1,367
    Location:
    New Zealand

    [​IMG]

    Really??.
     
    Ankit likes this.
  6. mick10

    mick10

    Joined:
    2 Jan 2012
    Messages:
    1,387
    Location:
    Somewhere it rains a lot.
    Team supported:
    City
    You’re absolutely right. I think the problem isn’t the losing more the manner of it sometimes.
     
    Cornish_Blue likes this.
  7. Kinkys Left Foot

    Kinkys Left Foot

    Joined:
    2 Sep 2008
    Messages:
    2,638
    I didnt think I could despise Spurs any more than I already do but an unfortunate youtube video appeared in my current box yesterday.
    I wont link it as it was a piece that wanted me to put my foot through the TV and dispatch the unfortunate delinquent utter wankstain giving it da Bruv massive whilst piling in on our club, with a spot of City Bingo, Raz for a tackle which was no worse than Dele Alli put in on De Bruyne last season and generally being a right **** despite the fact we played the twats off the park and would have been worthy 0-4 winners.

    Just fuck off you Spurs wankers! ANd NO i've never seen you win the League.
     
    Cornish_Blue likes this.
  8. mick10

    mick10

    Joined:
    2 Jan 2012
    Messages:
    1,387
    Location:
    Somewhere it rains a lot.
    Team supported:
    City
    Still had 67% possession from the time the team went down to 10. Couldn’t finish chances, concede with few attacks. That’s what lost that game.
     
  9. salfordbluetrue

    salfordbluetrue

    Joined:
    2 Jul 2013
    Messages:
    1,663
    A lot of what you say is true but the intention of the FA was to cause a smoke screen so they could go on cheating, do we pay Boots to do our dope testing no , but we do use refs to do our validating of refs decisions, VAR is great if you use an independent company who are on continual assessment of a government body
     
  10. mick10

    mick10

    Joined:
    2 Jan 2012
    Messages:
    1,387
    Location:
    Somewhere it rains a lot.
    Team supported:
    City
    Think there are too many just at the mo don’t offer much going forward, well in front of goal. I’ll take his defensive play at the moment which throws up another issue at present also :(
     

Share This Page