Tottenham Hotspur in High Court as local business starts case against 'unlawful' purchase order that could block new 56,000-capacity stadium worth £400m
Tottenham locked in High Court battle against a local business
Archway Sheet Metal Works are blocking development of new stadium
Archway refuses to sell Spurs its land, which is next to White Hart Lane
The company is challenging a compulsory purchase order in court
Tottenham want to open a £400m, 56,000-capacity stadium by 2017
An unexplained fire ripped through Archway's property last November
CLICK HERE for all the latest Tottenham Hotspur news
By JOHN ASTON, PRESS ASSOCIATION
PUBLISHED: 10:29 GMT, 17 February 2015 | UPDATED: 16:09 GMT, 17 February 2015
A business standing in the way of Tottenham Hotspur’s £400 million stadium redevelopment has claimed at the High Court that an invalid compulsory purchase order is being used to force it out.
Archway Sheet Metal Works is asking a judge to quash the 'unlawful' order.
If the application succeeds it would be a major blow to controversial plans for the new 56,000 capacity stadium complex.
Last November, a mystery fire gutted the premises near the North Stand at Premier League club Tottenham’s White Hart Lane ground in north London.
Mr Justice Dove, who has revealed he is an Aston Villa fan, has been told by Archway lawyers that the police are currently 'investigating the cause of arson'.
The owners say they have received 'bomb threats'.
Josif Josif, 46, who runs the family business, said at the time of the fire: 'People were calling us and threatening us and we were receiving bomb threats and that started a few months ago, but we don’t know if that’s got anything to do with it.'
The firm describes itself as a 'wonderfully old-fashioned family business' producing metal items for the catering and hospitality industry.
The owners have been in a dispute with Spurs for the last decade over its redevelopment plans.
The club has planning permission for the new stadium it hopes to open for the 2018-19 season.
A Tottenham club spokesman said: 'We have already successfully and amicably relocated more than 70 businesses in the area to the satisfaction of all parties concerned and a number of these organisations continue to reside in the borough.
'Whilst we were able to accommodate all these other businesses’ requests, in the instance of Archway, we have been unable to reach agreement over the period of the last seven years.'
The club has planning permission for the new stadium it hopes to open for the 2018-19 season.
The London Borough of Haringey made the compulsory purchase order (CPO) in March 2012. It was confirmed by the Communities Secretary in July 2014 following a public inquiry.
As well as challenging the legality of the CPO itself, Archway says proposed new changes to the Spurs project have come to light which are so substantial that they 'alter the viability case made at the inquiry' and further undermine the order.
The new proposals involve 'massive intensification of the scheme' - making it substantially different from the project for which the CPO was obtained.
Christopher Lockhart-Mummery QC, appearing for Archway, is submitting to the judge that an application for disclosure of documents held by Tottenham Hotspur Ltd has revealed the extent of the changes.
The QC said in written submissions that Tottenham dismissed them as matters of 'minutiae' within 'a sea of detail' which was 'irrelevant'.
But in fact the Tottenham documents revealed discussions had taken place involving an updated design of the Spurs stadium and increasing its capacity by 5,000.
Other potential improvements included an increase in residential development, incorporating 900 units in five blocks, plus 60,000 square feet of commercial development space and a medical centre and a 30,000 square feet gym and fitness centre.
Mr Lockhart-Mummery says the proposals reveal the scheme is now potentially on 'a substantially different scale', raising substantial new issues as to its viability.
Discussion of the new proposals, says the QC, have taken place between Haringey Council and Tottenham Hotspur Ltd and representatives 'at high levels of Government', including UK Trade and Investment and HM Treasury, as well as the Greater London Authority (GLA) and Transport for London.