JohnMaddocksAxe
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 2,854
cleavers said:This I'm afraid is just rubbish, this is nothing to do with FFP or Platini.tmouseman said:It needs to happen as we all said this is a product of EUFA pair play rule.
If you keep the prices low you will never break even and so fall foul of the EPP.
If we need to blame anyone blame Plattini.
Even if 700 take the package at £2500 its £1.75m, only about half of that will come to City, as it covers all away tickets, which have to be paid for by the club to the home team. The only way we make much out of it as a club, is if we go out at the first hurdle of every cup competition, not exactly the clubs goal.
Add to that the other 35000 season card holders ALL going platinum (very unlikely), and you gain another £1.75m.
Even if you take both sums as money into City's bank account its £3.5m in total.
If we buy another Tevez it will cost £40m, at least TEN times what the extra revenue from the membership gives the club.
The main revenue for the club comes from TV money from the PL (around £50m), and the CL (a conservative £30-50m, depending on how far we go), so £80-100m in total, which makes the extra money from the membership schemes insignificant, though they will increase that portion of revenue obviously.
The membership schemes are designed to sell loyalty for cash, that is all, and its wrong.
Why do the club want this ? Well a successful City will be supported by a richer more corporate fan, who will spend much more AT THE CLUB per head than a welder from Moston, and as much as people bury their heads in the sand, the club want these fans more than it wants the working class fan, because they spend more around the club. They will then reward their "loyalty" by making sure they have the best tickets available for games away, where they can also sell corporate packages (revenue into the club) with a match ticket.
This is, of course, correct.
Yet it will not stop people mindlessly repeating the same old ridiculous justifications for any old extortion technique that is dreamed up purely to milk the fans of every last penny.
Silly ticket price rises might cover part of a leg of a Wayne Bridge but the way some zealots talk about it you would think that City's participation in Europe is finely balanced and determined only by how much money you as a fan are prepared to borrow from the local loan shark.
It's complete nonsense. FFP will be met by a variety of measure, of which ticket prices will be such a small part that it will be insignificant.
The more interesting reason is why they have been on a drive to change the demographic of the fans for the past couple of years.
In my opinion it has Cook's finger prints all over it. He was here before the take over on a huge salary and as possibly the most high profile chief exec in football.
To justify being retained in this position he has to have a selling point. His selling point is milking a market for all it can be milked for. He is marketing pure and simple. He is all about showing how he can increases revenue streams and 'building' a prestige brans.
Don't get me wrong, I don't imagine the owners are averse to changing City's fan demographic to a 'luxury brand' but their participation and place at the club isn't solely based around that concept. If Cook cannot show that he can milk the fan base (and change it if necesary) for every last penny then there really is very little that marks him out as justifying his salary and place as the most high profile chief exec in football.
I think it is pretty obvious that the whole Superbia, Platinum and Gold scheme is pure marketing and straight from the marketing man's handbook. And attracting an as-cash-rich-as-possible demographic is vital to any marketing man 'building' a brand.
I don't excuse the owners from this drive to milk the fans for every last penny. In reality the buck stops with them. But their losses here (which will NEVER be made back through the football club - by traditional means anyway) are so much that I find it hard to believe that the manic milking of the fans and the significant rises in the price of everything over the last two years are high on their agenda. I don't think they are against it but much more likely, imo, is that they are somewhat detached unaware of what such pricing does to the traditional fan, whilst being fed the 'impressive' progress on revenue streams by those on the ground all the time.
I have some sympathy with the "that's what happens, deal with it" mob. They view football and football clubs in a totally different way to me. I don't support ASDA or Tesco but if they see it as comparable then it's just a difference of opinion.
What I would respect more though is if Cook reflected their blunt and honest view of things, instead of constantly giving it the crap about the traditional fans being massively important to him. Next to the importance he places on justifying his position and salary and increasing fan revenue streams it is so insignificant it isn't funny.