Swansea v Chelsea/Arse Vs West ham/Hazard incident

johnny on the spot said:
Cobwebcat said:
bluesoup said:
Kicking children in front of millions of people is in need of a lengthy ban. Whether the kid had previous, fell on the ball, wasted time makes no difference. If a teacher kicked a kid in a school they would be on a gross misconduct charge... If an adult kicked a kid on the street it would be assault...

And... If you look closely he kicks his chest and the ball...

He kicked a ball from underneath an adult

17 is still a minor.

Come on you can make plenty of adult decisions from 16 up my point is he isn't a Seven year old child....and he didn't kick him.
 
bb2.gif
 
bluesoup said:
MeatnSpudsMCFC said:
bluesoup said:
Kicking children in front of millions of people is in need of a lengthy ban. Whether the kid had previous, fell on the ball, wasted time makes no difference. If a teacher kicked a kid in a school they would be on a gross misconduct charge... If an adult kicked a kid on the street it would be assault...

And... If you look closely he kicks his chest and the ball...

He's seventeen... not in school.

Whatever age the ball boy is, hazard should not have kicked out at him. It's not hazards call to bully the 17 yr old. Players can be sent off for much less!

Bully? Fuck me, I've read it all now.
 
GStar said:
RandomJ said:
No a nudge would have been just a little tap. Hazard brings his leg back and gives him a proper kick. He was frustrated and lashed out.

Absolute rubbish.

It's a controlled motion, aimed to kick the ball out from underneath him. His body language and prance with the ball afterwards is not those of a man who's just lost his cool.

Exactly.
 
Hazard dragged him down first, then kicks ball from under him.

ixScpkduftksE.gif


That's different to ball boy deliberately slowing game down by lying on top of it
 
bluesoup said:
MeatnSpudsMCFC said:
bluesoup said:
Kicking children in front of millions of people is in need of a lengthy ban. Whether the kid had previous, fell on the ball, wasted time makes no difference. If a teacher kicked a kid in a school they would be on a gross misconduct charge... If an adult kicked a kid on the street it would be assault...

And... If you look closely he kicks his chest and the ball...

He's seventeen... not in school.

Whatever age the ball boy is, hazard should not have kicked out at him. It's not hazards call to bully the 17 yr old. Players can be sent off for much less!

So what do we do? Sit there and wait until the sun comes up tomorrow whilst the kid lies on the ball?
 
MadchesterCity said:
peoffrey, I believe you have exposed yourself as a Chelsea fan but you can seriously believe that kicking a child is a reasonable thing to do :O

Well you believe wrong. The way you're speaking to another Blue suggests you're not a City fan at all. Swansea instruct their Ball Boys to timewaste. I'd be ashamed to be one of theirs. Ashamed.

See you at QPR next Tuesday? No?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.