Tennis Thread


Is she a Scouser? Because it's never her fault.
I'm assuming that, with the regular change of ends, Sabalenka would have had the same technology monitoring her shots. It sounds like the excuse of a sulky brat, who didn't take kindly to getting beat.
 
Didn’t see the end of the match but woke up to read to BBC headline that Raducanu came “agonisingly close” to beating the Sabalenka. Then I saw the score and it was 6-4 at the end of a 2-0 win. So this is the BBC bigging her up again - just what she needs :(

In fairness, she did come close to winning the first set and she played pretty well from what I saw. Still dont think she’ll ever win another Grand Slam but I’ll be happy to come back on here and say I was wrong if she does.

The Alacaraz-Struff match was entertaining with Struff really going for some shots.
Someone on 5 live said that Raducanu was absolutely brilliant and narrowly lost. Then asked to mark Sabalenka and gave her a b-
 
Another impressive performance from Ben Shelton. Brilliant first serve and some bullets into the corners. Whilst I still can’t see beyond a Sinner-Alcaraz final, Shelton is definitely in the next group of players pushing for a top 4/5 ranking. On his day, he could definitely cause an upset.
 
Another impressive performance from Ben Shelton. Brilliant first serve and some bullets into the corners. Whilst I still can’t see beyond a Sinner-Alcaraz final, Shelton is definitely in the next group of players pushing for a top 4/5 ranking. On his day, he could definitely cause an upset.
As I said earlier and above, he's got a decent shot to face Sinner, now with fellow Italian Sonego in the way. It won't be easy, but Ben hasn't dropped a service yet, so I definitely favor him, despite the relatively "easy path" he has had thus far.

Even Ben admits he's not at the Sinner-Alcaraz level yet, but I'll be looking for progress should he get that far.
 
She played well in 20 minute spells, but Brilliant??? No way a brilliant performance wouldn't have won that second set. Error strewn last few games, but admittedly, played well in parts.
I'm not going to be too hard on Raducunu. Did she have chances to win either sets? Absolutely, and I was very impressed at how close she stayed during that time. She was up a break in the 2nd too, so it was possible for her to keep it going, but all credit to the World #1 she was playing who got it together to turn it around in the 2nd. I almost posted something here last night, but in not seeing anything otherwise yet, I wanted to be respectful of those that just watched things and how tough the loss was.

Up 4-2 in the first and 4-1 in the second to me shows she just needs the "lock down consistency" to take it further, easier said than done.

I also wholeheartedly agree with Andy Roddick on his sentiment that Raducanu should keep her current coach Mark Petchey and not be tempted to make a change, as I was very much impressed with her overall play and attitude during this week at Wimbledon.

 
Last edited:

Is she a Scouser? Because it's never her fault.
I will take the electronic line calls over the human eye any day of the week.

Thankfully the officials at the French Open will never have to point at clay ever again. Good riddance, and welcome to the 21st century!
 
Last edited:
I will take the electronic line calls over the human eye any day of the week.

Thankfully the officials at the French Open will never have to point at clay ever again. Good riddance, and welcome to the 21st century!
Yeah!
Fck lives, jobs, tradition.
Greedy, precious tennis players can't cope with a close dodgy call once in a while - even though they had hawkeye to appeal to. Getting like LIV golfers, completely self-centered. The players union doing nothing for the "little people" that have served them well for decades. Shock.
 
Last edited:
I will take the electronic line calls over the human eye any day of the week.

Thankfully the officials at the French Open will never have to point at clay ever again. Good riddance, and welcome to the 21st century!
It's great when it works. The human eye could see that Kartal shot at 4-4 in the first set was out by a long way, the electronic line call couldn't.
 
It's great when it works. The human eye could see that Kartal shot at 4-4 in the first set was out by a long way, the electronic line call couldn't.

Just seen that - the umpire could see it from where he was.
The club say that the operator forgot to press the 'on' button for the point, which sounds like a bizarre process (why would you turn it off?).

There have been a lot of complaints about the system, it seems odd to me to run it without doing so in parallel with human judges.
 
Just seen that - the umpire could see it from where he was.
The club say that the operator forgot to press the 'on' button for the point, which sounds like a bizarre process (why would you turn it off?).

Yeah, it's a great system for the most part (with video replay).... when it is actually turned on.


I was at a small ATP Challenger Tour 100 yesterday and it wasn't turned off once and worked just fine.

Also seemed a shame they decided to replay the point that Pavlyuchenkova clearly won too.

There have been a lot of complaints about the system, it seems odd to me to run it without doing so in parallel with human judges.

Interesting to read how the US and Australian Opens use video replay and Wimbledon does not. Wasn't aware of that, perhaps they should. No complaints there with 2+ years in use at those tourneys.

Pavlyuchenkova also called for video replay to be added to the ELC protocol. It is used at the U.S. Open and Australian Open, but not at Wimbledon.

One suggestion that ESPN's Chris Fowler also recommended during the tournament and before today's incident would be an added electronic board where calls such as "OUT" could be shown in addition to vocal call in case it is not heard over the crowd. Some place where both players could see it too.
 
I have seen the call in the Kartal v Pavlyuchenkova match.Shocking from the umpire.
However, Kartal is getting an easy ride here. Wouldn't it been more appropriate to have not contested the replayed point?????
 
Yeah, it's a great system for the most part (with video replay).... when it is actually turned on.


I was at a small ATP Challenger Tour 100 yesterday and it wasn't turned off once and worked just fine.

Also seemed a shame they decided to replay the point that Pavlyuchenkova clearly won too.



Interesting to read how the US and Australian Opens use video replay and Wimbledon does not. Wasn't aware of that, perhaps they should. No complaints there with 2+ years in use at those tourneys.

Pavlyuchenkova also called for video replay to be added to the ELC protocol. It is used at the U.S. Open and Australian Open, but not at Wimbledon.

One suggestion that ESPN's Chris Fowler also recommended during the tournament and before today's incident would be an added electronic board where calls such as "OUT" could be shown in addition to vocal call in case it is not heard over the crowd. Some place where both players could see it too.

The board for the crowd/players is a good idea.

It does seem odd that the protocol is to replay even when it's such a bad error. If there's no video replay, then there's no way of doing anything, and that seems wrong.
 
Kartal lost but she is a real battler. She had her chances in the first set but couldn’t win the decisive points. She will be back.
Norrie went through using his traditional skills. He is a real pro; a decent though not spectacular serve, a good back hand and he works the angles well to create a chance for a passing shot. He makes few mistakes and is tough and resilient. His ranking has dropped off from a high of 8 due largely to injuries. Not many British men get into the last eight but he reached the semi a few years ago. Unfortunately he meets Alcaraz in the quarter final, but he won’t go down easily. Well done.
 
Some great matches so far, but the post-match interviews are a mind-numbingly twee, strawberries and cream epitaph to a bygone age, and utterly lacking in depth and insight.
 
Some great matches so far, but the post-match interviews are a mind-numbingly twee, strawberries and cream epitaph to a bygone age, and utterly lacking in depth and insight.
I agree, but then I can't remember the last post-event sports interview that gave too much insight. All the post-match stuff for football is just the managers and players telling you what you already saw with your own eyes.
 
I'm sure the players in general are for the new technology that I assume reduces the percentage of wrong calls by line judges, but it's definitely taken away some entertainment/jeopardy from the spectator. Having the challenge system in place was pretty good I thought, and most of the time it looked like the players almost enjoyed waiting to see if the ball was in/out etc, can't remember too many incidents where players moaned about it anyway.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top