Terry racism trial, this is going to get nasty

St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
DiscoSteve said:
what would help everyone (especially St Helens Blue) is if that extra bit of Sky Footage which include the "are you saying I called you a..." was available

JT has never particularly been a model footballer but he's been proven INNOCENT

But it isn't available is it mate so I will have to form my own opinion and that is that he uses those words in a racist manner and not in a defensive/questioning manner.

And that is why it's good to know you aren't a Judge.

I think Terry is a ****.

Despite that, I'm not silly enough to let my obvious prejudice get in the way of labelling someone a racist, simply by going off a tv clip which proves hardly fucking anything, ESPECIALLY when the defendant, in this case, has not once denied saying those words.
 
DiscoSteve said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
DiscoSteve said:
what would help everyone (especially St Helens Blue) is if that extra bit of Sky Footage which include the "are you saying I called you a..." was available

JT has never particularly been a model footballer but he's been proven INNOCENT

But it isn't available is it mate so I will have to form my own opinion and that is that he uses those words in a racist manner and not in a defensive/questioning manner.
But it WAS available to the judge (exhasperated)

It's pointless trying to reason with some people, once they have one idea in their heads, nothing is going to change it, especially something as insignificant as evidence.
 
its not that he is innocent. More like he couldn't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty. If suarez had taken things to court, he would have gotten of too mainly because it is a non-issue in "his" culture.


Ashley Cole greatly helped Terry though. Guess Cheryl Cole is safe.
 
Vincents Tackle said:
DiscoSteve said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
But it isn't available is it mate so I will have to form my own opinion and that is that he uses those words in a racist manner and not in a defensive/questioning manner.
But it WAS available to the judge (exhasperated)

It's pointless trying to reason with some people, once they have one idea in their heads, nothing is going to change it, especially something as insignificant as evidence.
Similar to Michael Jackson being found not guilty of molesting kids.
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
intheknow! said:
The Judge accepted that Terry used that sentence BUT only because he thought Ferdinand had accused of saying that. Ergo Terry did not call him a 'black ****'. That is what the Judge has ruled, Terry is NOT GUILTY!

Yeah because the British Justice System is always correct hey? One person deeming what he said was not racist is not justice for me. And he did say the words-watch the video. Guilty or not , he said it and we ALL know what he meant - Hope the **** breaks his leg and gets a similar ban to Suarez

Your just making shit up now. We all know what he said he admitted to saying it, he never hid the fact he said those words

Fuck me sideways you've changed your tune lad. You're accepting the verdict of the law Boyblue?

I remember you saying that Ched's mate being found not guilty was unsafe because OJ fucking Simpson got off. Bonkers.
 
ghost305 said:
its not that he is innocent. More like he couldn't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty. If suarez had taken things to court, he would have gotten of too mainly because it is a non-issue in "his" culture.


Ashley Cole greatly helped Terry though. Guess Cheryl Cole is safe.

Culture doesn't matter for much. Our laws dont account for ignorance
 
intheknow! said:
dazdon said:
intheknow! said:
The Judge accepted that Terry used that sentence BUT only because he thought Ferdinand had accused of saying that. Ergo Terry did not call him a 'black ****'. That is what the Judge has ruled, Terry is NOT GUILTY!

Exactly!!


Some people don't understand the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty and just repeat their ill informed prejudices. Lets hope those who refuse to accept that Terry did not call Ferdinand what he was accused of, never find themselves accused of something they did not do. I'm sure they would come to appreciate the Law a bit more.


Lol just like Harry rednapp, just like the bloke who raped an eight year old girl because she was wearing grown up clothes "it was ok", just like fergie and his loose bowel speeding farce....fuck should we go on....?

Let's face it this country is NO different to any of those countries we snub for having rules for one and not the other.

For the first time ever, today I'm a tad embarrassed of my skin colour and the great British establishment.
 
Terry was not proven innocent, he was found to have insufficient evidence for a conviction, thats in no way saying various arguments could not be put forward to say he did say it... unless you have a witness of video evidence its always one word against the other...



the world of difference between the two is enormous...
 
Petetheblu said:
intheknow! said:
dazdon said:
Exactly!!


Some people don't understand the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty and just repeat their ill informed prejudices. Lets hope those who refuse to accept that Terry did not call Ferdinand what he was accused of, never find themselves accused of something they did not do. I'm sure they would come to appreciate the Law a bit more.


Lol just like Harry rednapp, just like the bloke who raped an eight year old girl because she was wearing grown up clothes "it was ok", just like fergie and his loose bowel speeding farce....fuck should we go on....?

Let's face it this country is NO different to any of those countries we snub for having rules for one and not the other.

For the first time ever, today I'm a tad embarrassed of my skin colour and the great British establishment.

WTF


Its good you haven't overreacted to the decision
 
Vincents Tackle said:
DiscoSteve said:
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:
But it isn't available is it mate so I will have to form my own opinion and that is that he uses those words in a racist manner and not in a defensive/questioning manner.
But it WAS available to the judge (exhasperated)

It's pointless trying to reason with some people, once they have one idea in their heads, nothing is going to change it, especially something as insignificant as evidence.



Ho Ho Ho the feckin irony!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.