SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
It is not one or the other at all.hgblue said:DontLookBackInAnger said:I'm guessing those that see it as a weakness don't hold the view that he has mis-handled the situation. Moreover I know a number of dippers that are outragued at their ownership for getting involved in what went on at the weekend.Prestwich_Blue said:Interesting that at Liverpool we've seen a manager mis-handle a delicate situation and get told to put it right by his club's owners and we've all applauded the owners for doing the right thing.
Yet at Manchester City the same thing happens and people call it a sign of weakness.
Mancini has either handled the situation well and having Tevez back now is a sign of weakness on his behalf, or he has handled the situation badly and has been put in his place by the club's owners. One or the other, not both.
Since when are they the only options?
What about Mancini handled it well, so well that Tevez is having to come back and apologise having failed to hold the club over a barrell. Mancini has won whichever way you look at it.