ianw16 said:Malty said:One of the most anti-climatic and overhyped fights of all time.
Boxing doesn't have that "big fight" feel anymore in the Tyson, Lewis days. Even The Prince Naseem Hamed days I miss.
Tyson? Yes, I'll give you that, although he didn't last that long. The rest you mention are nobodies.
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:ianw16 said:Malty said:One of the most anti-climatic and overhyped fights of all time.
Boxing doesn't have that "big fight" feel anymore in the Tyson, Lewis days. Even The Prince Naseem Hamed days I miss.
Tyson? Yes, I'll give you that, although he didn't last that long. The rest you mention are nobodies.
Lewis is a nobody now?
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNdcoDuLlSU[/video]argyle said:[video]https://vine.co/v/e7LA5TqzhhO[/video]
leighton said:Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:ianw16 said:Tyson? Yes, I'll give you that, although he didn't last that long. The rest you mention are nobodies.
Lewis is a nobody now?
Lennox Lewis was a great heavyweight fighter. Back then the heavyweight division was worth a look now it needs a injection of new young blood aka Tyson Fury , Dentonay Wilder and even Anthony Joshua are needed in that division.
You need to look at the lighter weight divisions. Just look at the Groves v Froch fights 2 brilliant fights exciting and good fights in the UK there recently. I think just British fighters there is some good fights to be made that could well see a great few fights.
At featherweight Selby v Warrington could well be made.
Frampton v Quigg or Kidd Galahad all 3 could fight each other with time.
Lightweight theres Kevin Mitchell v Terry Flanagan or Anthony Crolla
Middleweight Lee V Martin Murray V Eubank Jnr V Billy Joe Saunders
Super Middleweights got a lot. Taking out Froch. You could see Groves v DeGale V Callum Smith. Also Callum Smith v Rocky Fielding has to happen.
Brook v Khan if it ever happens.
Theres some good boxing in the UK if the promotors can work together some great local fights that would sell out and would offer great entertainment if given a chance to get the go ahead.
leighton said:City Raider said:Mayweather's best move was taking the fight only after witnessing Manny's steady decline over the last 2-3 years.
The second best was selling it as the fight of the century.
The ring stuff was easy by comparison.
More like flight of the century.
Money put on a clinic there. Even if they fought 5 years ago the result would of been the same.
jared said:leighton said:City Raider said:Mayweather's best move was taking the fight only after witnessing Manny's steady decline over the last 2-3 years.
The second best was selling it as the fight of the century.
The ring stuff was easy by comparison.
More like flight of the century.
Money put on a clinic there. Even if they fought 5 years ago the result would of been the same.
That's debatable. While both boxers aged the same amount, Mayweather is a defensive counterpuncher, Manny is an offensive aggressive fighter.
Age catches up with offensive boxer alot more than a defensive one.
Pac wasn't robbed in the slightest, money won fair and square but it was disappointing not seeing him fight 2009 prime Pac. It is at least 50-50 for me who ends up victorious.
leighton said:jared said:leighton said:Money put on a clinic there. Even if they fought 5 years ago the result would of been the same.
That's debatable. While both boxers aged the same amount, Mayweather is a defensive counterpuncher, Manny is an offensive aggressive fighter.
Age catches up with offensive boxer alot more than a defensive one.
Pac wasn't robbed in the slightest, money won fair and square but it was disappointing not seeing him fight 2009 prime Pac. It is at least 50-50 for me who ends up victorious.
Money is slowing down now compared to 5 years ago. People will slate his record but he has boxed the fighters put in front of him and won all. No one likes his style in the US.
jared said:leighton said:jared said:That's debatable. While both boxers aged the same amount, Mayweather is a defensive counterpuncher, Manny is an offensive aggressive fighter.
Age catches up with offensive boxer alot more than a defensive one.
Pac wasn't robbed in the slightest, money won fair and square but it was disappointing not seeing him fight 2009 prime Pac. It is at least 50-50 for me who ends up victorious.
Money is slowing down now compared to 5 years ago. People will slate his record but he has boxed the fighters put in front of him and won all. No one likes his style in the US.
Nah, not just in the US. Many people around the world hates his style of boxing.
Floyd has even said it himself when he was being criticized; people saying he was boring to watch and fans wanted him to be more aggressive.
"The less you get hit in the sport, the longer you last,"
While that is his winning formula, it nevertheless annoys people like mad and is very unpopular with fans, compared to a boxer who takes a chance to initiate the of fence and is aggressive. Just like how Chelsea is so unpopular and boring with their style of football. People will always like the more adventurous and entertaining side with attractive style.
Also, as I said before both have slowed down, but Pac gets the worst end of it as an aggressive boxer than mayweather a defensive boxer. I don't care about the shoulder injury. I am saying it will be great if we saw a prime 2009 Pac fight mayweather, when his skills, speed and power as an aggressive boxer wasn't as diminished. In my view the way mayweather cherry picks his opponents to fight when they are not in their prime will always be a stain in his record. My 2 cents
Uncle Wally One Ball said:Why are people discussing this fight as though it had any credibility at all? It was a joke, clearly a carve up, and they have had the last laugh by taking home a shedfull of cash each with no downside. The build up was so long that it was on in various Spanish alehouses that I was in, and from the manner of each of them before you could tell that it was a load of bollocks of an event. Very disappointing, but people buy into it rather than criticise it so it all continues as a circus.
blue mash up said:Mc Donnell fights Kameda at weekend and there is a card from Birmingham featuring Joshua and Rose.
Doesnt matter who won, that would apply, and this will always happen. In fact, I think it has been discussed already. Quelle surprise.buckshot said:Uncle Wally One Ball said:Why are people discussing this fight as though it had any credibility at all? It was a joke, clearly a carve up, and they have had the last laugh by taking home a shedfull of cash each with no downside. The build up was so long that it was on in various Spanish alehouses that I was in, and from the manner of each of them before you could tell that it was a load of bollocks of an event. Very disappointing, but people buy into it rather than criticise it so it all continues as a circus.
If it was a ca eve up then Manny would have won a close decision and they both would have doubled their money on a rematch,
leighton said:blue mash up said:Mc Donnell fights Kameda at weekend and there is a card from Birmingham featuring Joshua and Rose.
The 2 American fights are good. This weekend with McDonnell and Burns fighting. The Birmingham card isnt great. Matt Macklin and Callum Smith are all fighting on the bill but against nobodies which is sad. Callum needs a test get him in with Rocky Fielding the worst card ever by Matchroom. AJ fighting a bum headlining it. I cant blame Frankie Gavin who was supposed to headline it he is fighting Kell Brook instead. There 30th of May card will be there best card of the year. 3 world title fights a shame it will be on SKY PPV.
ell said:leighton said:blue mash up said:Mc Donnell fights Kameda at weekend and there is a card from Birmingham featuring Joshua and Rose.
The 2 American fights are good. This weekend with McDonnell and Burns fighting. The Birmingham card isnt great. Matt Macklin and Callum Smith are all fighting on the bill but against nobodies which is sad. Callum needs a test get him in with Rocky Fielding the worst card ever by Matchroom. AJ fighting a bum headlining it. I cant blame Frankie Gavin who was supposed to headline it he is fighting Kell Brook instead. There 30th of May card will be there best card of the year. 3 world title fights a shame it will be on SKY PPV.
I havent even bothered to look at this weekends card, is it even worse than the Geordie bore one from last month?
Matchroom are becoming a joke, it was only a few months ago they charged PPV for Bellew versus Cleverley for fuck sake.
As for the May 30th card, I dont even think thats great. Mitchell/Selby in good fights and if it was Brook vs a live body it would certainly be interesting but instead hes in with a commonwealth level fighter who got found out by Bundu