Gabriel
Well-Known Member
To be King of England.Tbf the Stuarts were usurpers also so his claim is a bad as the present lot
The earl of louden has a better claim
To be King of England.Tbf the Stuarts were usurpers also so his claim is a bad as the present lot
The earl of louden has a better claim
The suggestion that the paedo Prince is more important than @kaz7 is outrageous.You see I just dont get this Royalty thing, why should Prince Andrew or Edward be a more important person than....oh I dont know, Blue Mist or Kaz or some charitable voluntary worker, the concept is outmoded and goes against modern equality, and why does one family need 3000 or so rooms in various castles and estates with bucket loads of servants paid for by Joe public ? Is it purely tradition, or tourist income, if thats the case why not have the worlds biggest and best theme park or something ?
The concept of a common tourist attraction surely diminishes the apparent majesty and reverence of their Royal highnesses.
And why/how do they bring all this income in ? Tourists dont have tea with Princess Anne or Camilla do they, in fact they dont see the Royal family, surely they would come to see the buildings, like they do in Paris...Tower Of London. The Mall, Horse Guards Parade etc, Windsor Castle and Buck Palace could be opened to the public, admittance fees, earning millions and still have the changing of the guard etc. Paris has more tourists than London and no Royals.
The suggestion that the paedo Prince is more important than @kaz7 is outrageous.
Predetermined outcome.Worth a thread of it's own? Including a poll.
You see I just dont get this Royalty thing, why should Prince Andrew or Edward be a more important person than....oh I dont know, Blue Mist or Kaz or some charitable voluntary worker, the concept is outmoded and goes against modern equality, and why does one family need 3000 or so rooms in various castles and estates with bucket loads of servants paid for by Joe public ? Is it purely tradition, or tourist income, if thats the case why not have the worlds biggest and best theme park or something ?
The concept of a common tourist attraction surely diminishes the apparent majesty and reverence of their Royal highnesses.
And why/how do they bring all this income in ? Tourists dont have tea with Princess Anne or Camilla do they, in fact they dont see the Royal family, surely they would come to see the buildings, like they do in Paris...Tower Of London. The Mall, Horse Guards Parade etc, Windsor Castle and Buck Palace could be opened to the public, admittance fees, earning millions and still have the changing of the guard etc. Paris has more tourists than London and no Royals.
I'm ashamed to say I've not been to any of them :( and I live here.View attachment 28732
Pre pandemic top 100 tourist attractions in 2019, sort of dispells the myth they bring in masses of tourism, all 3 royal sites bring in just more than legoland .
That list sort of proves that it doesnt matter if the RF is in those buildings, visitors would still go to see the buildings and grounds, Chatsworth got more visitors that Buck Palace.View attachment 28732
Pre pandemic top 100 tourist attractions in 2019, sort of dispells the myth they bring in masses of tourism, all 3 royal sites bring in just more than legoland .