The British Monarchy

Honestly, I do not know anyone's lives that are positively affected by the presence of the monarchy. Until yesterday, barely anyone I knew ever discussed it in a positive sense, or a negative one, yet now are filled with outpourings of grief and are desperate to change their social media photographs. As for The Queen, I feel sad for her family, who have lost someone they loved, but I cannot share that grief myself. For the people who profess the fantastic job she did, I have no idea of the quality of the job she did but I know that she was enormously well compensated for it - I have no negative feelings about that, she may have deserved it and she may not have done. She has raised four children: Charles is currently the subject of substantial allegations about cash for peerages, had an affair, and is a divorcee; Andrew is also a divorcee and has significant and heinous allegations against his character; Anne is a divorcee and Edward I know absolutely nothing about. Her children are not a symbol of what an amazing woman she was but if we look at ourselves, is she so different?

May she rest in peace and if you are genuinely affected by her passing, my sympathy is with you.
 
BobKowalski said:
Prince Phillip was Greek.
Click to expand...
A myth. He was a Romanov. His mum lived in exile in Greece.
Some years ago, when bodies were found at Ekaterinberg, they needed Romanov DNA to prove these bodies were the famously murdered Russian Royal Family. They used Phil’s DNA and proved that they were indeed his ancestors.
(voice offstage, “ Hello Cabbage”.
 
urban genie said:
But william is the same, at least 2 affairs (one while she was preggers) and has a official concubine fir all his anal play, also a **** with his brother.

In charlies time he was told who to marry despite it not being who he wanted too.

If you weigh it up Wills is a bigger prick than his dad
Click to expand...
I didn't know about his affairs, is this proven fact or hearsay ?
 
Don Karleone said:
2074243-43480070-2560-1440.jpg
Click to expand...
Whatever happened to him
 
Mad Eyed Screamer said:
And Charles is the first King to have had a mistress?
Maybe he should have had Diana's head chopped off like Henry VIIII and become a widower, to avoid being a divorcee?
And how many illegitimate kids did Edward VII have?
Plus the rest of them...
Click to expand...
Back then Kings were expected to shag everything that moved.
Anyway now Liz has gone fuck the lot off imo.
Charlie and Chlamydia ?
No thanks.
 
Bill Walker said:
Just to add......If this Royalty thing is carried on with and if Charlie care's as much as his Mother did about the role of Royalty, he would hand succession now to William and miss his go, the guy's is a weak fuckwit who cheated on his wife from day 1, and his wife has the morals of an alleycat.
But he doesn't care imo, he want's his name in history.
Click to expand...
“Am I to be the first Prince of Wales who is not allowed to have a mistress?”
 
Bill Walker said:
I didn't know about his affairs, is this proven fact or hearsay ?
Click to expand...
No it's fact one of Kates mates, and anyway by just mentioning the affairs it implies, for you affairs are a no no, but having a royal mistress to shove dildos up is arse are fine?
 
oldius said:
Honestly, I do not know anyone's lives that are positively affected by the presence of the monarchy. Until yesterday, barely anyone I knew ever discussed it in a positive sense, or a negative one, yet now are filled with outpourings of grief and are desperate to change their social media photographs. As for The Queen, I feel sad for her family, who have lost someone they loved, but I cannot share that grief myself. For the people who profess the fantastic job she did, I have no idea of the quality of the job she did but I know that she was enormously well compensated for it - I have no negative feelings about that, she may have deserved it and she may not have done. She has raised four children: Charles is currently the subject of substantial allegations about cash for peerages, had an affair, and is a divorcee; Andrew is also a divorcee and has significant and heinous allegations against his character; Anne is a divorcee and Edward I know absolutely nothing about. Her children are not a symbol of what an amazing woman she was but if we look at ourselves, is she so different?

May she rest in peace and if you are genuinely affected by her passing, my sympathy is with you.
Click to expand...
Where as i largely agree with most of that, you only have to look at the thousands that will line the streets for her to see her drive past. Thousands smiling broadly, waving flags, buzzing because they saw the queen. Now although i would say im a mild royalist (happy with the concept though needs reform and slimming down) i wouldnt travel too far to see her, but thousands do and it makes their day!

So whatever it is, and ive no idea, she brought total happiness to millions of people when they saw her. If you could bottle it youd make billions
 
oldius said:
Honestly, I do not know anyone's lives that are positively affected by the presence of the monarchy. Until yesterday, barely anyone I knew ever discussed it in a positive sense, or a negative one, yet now are filled with outpourings of grief and are desperate to change their social media photographs. As for The Queen, I feel sad for her family, who have lost someone they loved, but I cannot share that grief myself. For the people who profess the fantastic job she did, I have no idea of the quality of the job she did but I know that she was enormously well compensated for it - I have no negative feelings about that, she may have deserved it and she may not have done. She has raised four children: Charles is currently the subject of substantial allegations about cash for peerages, had an affair, and is a divorcee; Andrew is also a divorcee and has significant and heinous allegations against his character; Anne is a divorcee and Edward I know absolutely nothing about. Her children are not a symbol of what an amazing woman she was but if we look at ourselves, is she so different?

May she rest in peace and if you are genuinely affected by her passing, my sympathy is with you.
Click to expand...
Is getting a divorce a poor reflection on a mother? Oops say a sizeable portion of sons and daughters.
 
shemnel said:
The passing of the Queen should be the end of the royal family.
Click to expand...
People can keep saying it, and there have been vocal supporters of it for centuries, but it’s very unlikely to happen at this current time.

I’m no uber-fan of the monarchy, I never watch the weddings or join in much with the jubilee stuff that happens for example, but I feel it is part of the nation’s identity, the good AND the bad of it. I’m not sure what would be gained by abolishment outside of some cost savings and if people think that means more money in their pocket then they need to be less gullible.
 
Citizen of Legoland said:
People can keep saying it, and there have been vocal supporters of it for centuries, but it’s very unlikely to happen at this current time.

I’m no uber-fan of the monarchy, I never watch the weddings or join in much with the jubilee stuff that happens for example, but I feel it is part of the nation’s identity, the good AND the bad of it. I’m not sure what would be gained by abolishment outside of some cost savings and if people think that means more money in their pocket then they need to be less gullible.
Click to expand...

And people will continue to say it. The finances are neither here nor there, as you say.
 
west didsblue said:
I think referenda have proven themselves to be not the best of ideas. If enough people felt strongly enough about it, one of the parties could include it in their manifesto at the next election and then we could see if they get into power on the basis of abolishment of the monarchy.
Click to expand...
Referenda are ok if it's written in that any change is backed by a substantial majority - 70 or 75%. Westminster FC have had their arses well and truly bitten by the last one, and both Boris and Liz were quick to fuck off Wee Jimmy for another Scottish one. If it's just a simple majority - 50.1% - it can bring a right balls up down the driveway.
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
Referenda are ok if it's written in that any change is backed by a substantial majority - 70 or 75%. Westminster FC have had their arses well and truly bitten by the last one, and both Boris and Liz were quick to fuck off Wee Jimmy for another Scottish one. If it's just a simple majority - 50.1% - it can bring a right balls up down the driveway.
Click to expand...

What an odd concept of democracy, 1 in 4 don't agree so we go with them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top