The Conservative Party

OK... I'll correct it then.



Its well documented that the Israeli Army occupying the Golam Heights uses its field hospitals to treat anti government fighters involved in the war in Syria - including members of factions linked to al-Qaida

but in any event it was still a misuse of UK Development Funds
Not quite the same as funding Al Qaeda is it?
Don’t get me wrong, it’s bad enough that Patel is having unofficial meetings with a view to diverting aid funding, but there’s no need to exaggerate.
Also, using Electronic Intifada as a source is hardly impartial either.
 
Not quite the same as funding Al Qaeda is it?
Don’t get me wrong, it’s bad enough that Patel is having unofficial meetings with a view to diverting aid funding, but there’s no need to exaggerate.
Also, using Electronic Intifada as a source is hardly impartial either.


If the meetings were above board ... why didnt she tell people about them.

If the aid was for 'humanitarian reasons' .... why didnt she just say so from the outset.

Why did she lie about the other two meetings?

Conservatives ...... watch what they do ..... not what they say.
 
It's mental that Tory MP's think that calling her kind will somehow disregard an independent review that confirms she is a bully.

Their opinion doesn't change what she is, if that were the case every criminal would use a friend to excuse them of their crimes.
 
I've said it before if the Civil servant who's taking her to court doesn't settle it will all come out in public.

She has a history of it going back to her PR days.

Says something about MPs being as cowardly as Republicans in the US about it. Publicaly posting support to her then anonymously telling journalists they aren't happy about the way the cabinet doesn't give a fuck.
 
It's mental that Tory MP's think that calling her kind will somehow disregard an independent review that confirms she is a bully.

Their opinion doesn't change what she is, if that were the case every criminal would use a friend to excuse them of their crimes.

If that were the case Ronnie Biggs could have got his optician to say he wasn't on the run but was merely visiting Brazil as part of an eye test.
 
I've said it before if the Civil servant who's taking her to court doesn't settle it will all come out in public.

She has a history of it going back to her PR days.

Says something about MPs being as cowardly as Republicans in the US about it. Publicaly posting support to her then anonymously telling journalists they aren't happy about the way the cabinet doesn't give a fuck.

I think yesterdays events will have just stiffened Philip Rutman's resolve to have it all out at a tribunal - he will have known Alex Allan and won't be impressed with how his position was undermined by Johnson - its shit or bust now. Like it is for the rapist the hearing date will just get put back and back.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.