yousawmestandinalone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 115
scowy68 said:yeh they usually are funny.except when it's fucking David Pleat!
Who's fucking David Pleat?
scowy68 said:yeh they usually are funny.except when it's fucking David Pleat!
davymcfc said:yeah on the football hooligan act. pathetic rules. should just give him a fine but they wont.Trigger said:Was funny but not worth a court case and 3 year ban ;)
marco said:my lad got a ban from the club but however had it lifted (mistaken identity) if he had gone to games during the ban the club could not have done anthing as it was not enforced through the courts yes they could have had him removed by security or shall i say security could have asked him to leave, a fine line here as if security or a steward grab you by the arm to remove you it is actually asault
Trigger said:marco said:my lad got a ban from the club but however had it lifted (mistaken identity) if he had gone to games during the ban the club could not have done anthing as it was not enforced through the courts yes they could have had him removed by security or shall i say security could have asked him to leave, a fine line here as if security or a steward grab you by the arm to remove you it is actually asault
Wrong! sorry but if you believe this, but I can catagorically state you are wrong.
Here is the actual wording issued to stewards.
Ejections:
Ejections should be carried out with the minimum of force. Stewards, like everybody else are governed by the law and should be confident that the ejection can be justified. Should any difficulties arise then a Police Officer will be available to assist but the responsibility for breaches of the ground regulations in the first instance lies with the steward.
The law provides a power for every citizen, which of course includes stewards, to take reasonable steps to prevent a person a person who is breaking or threatening to break the peace from doing so. Those reasonable steps will include detaining anyone against their will, short of arresting them. This in effect means that a steward can lawfully detain anyone who is misbehaving for the purpose of ejecting them. This power is given by means of a case Albert v Lavin 1981 and is commonly known as "Detention short of Arrest".
marco said:[its a fine line trig, if my lad had gone to a match and was sitting in say level 3 watching the game saying nothing he's hardly breaking or threatening to break the peace, missbehaving in a manner likely to cause distress or any other crime however the law likes to dress it up. if say you knocked his glasses into his eye while over reacting to evict him 'you personaly are liable for asault charges, a sterward or security have no more powers than jo blogs making a citizens arest and beleive me the citizens arest situation can backfire and the honest party end up getting sued
manchester blue said:davymcfc said:yeah on the football hooligan act. pathetic rules. should just give him a fine but they wont.
No a lifetime ban is the only way to stop knobheads running on the pitch.
Hamann Pineapple said:manchester blue said:No a lifetime ban is the only way to stop knobheads running on the pitch.
Yeah, they should've hung Erica Roe that would've shown 'em.