Because they genuinely have no idea that they are just pawns in the game of clickbait. The papers know that they have the bait to tempt those of a certain mindset and they go for it, relentlessly, because it drives advertising revenue. Those that hate what is said click to object and those that support it click to feed their narrative. It has gone on so long now that they absolutely believe it but could not give any detail on what she has actually done, with evidence, to prove the reason for such hatred of a young woman.Genuine question; do you think your opinion matters when King Charles III openly expresses love for both Harry and Meghan Markle and knows there are bridges to mend?
Why would you assume a brother would turn his back on his sibling and not want to, also, mend the bridge?
I watched the video of the two couples strolling together earlier. The fact that Kate was detached from the group - standing a couple of feet away from the others - will be Meghan's doing. Meghan holding hands with Harry will be described as some failure to meet protocol and, of course, Kate stayed away from Balmoral because of a duty to her children while Meghan stayed away because she was told to, being the divisive force that she is. As for The Mail, they will just feed the beast and then send their profits to the tax haven of Bermuda, making no contribution to the country's services, and their readers will be grateful.
Last edited: