The Labour Government

[mosssideblue]

Let's face it none of the main parties have a clue about it and more to the point I don't think they care.
The Rwanda scheme was doomed to fail and it has but Labour should not have got rid of it so quick and they have been very disrespectful to Rwanda.
Successive goverments have promised us to sort it out and never have. It's the tax payers who suffer as ever.

Exactly how have we been disrespectful to Rwanda?

 

[BrianW]

When did the UK start worrying about being 'disrespectful' to other nations?

It's practically our trade mark.

 

[bluethrunthru]

good

 

[west didsblue]

Let's face it none of the main parties have a clue about it and more to the point I don't think they care.
The Rwanda scheme was doomed to fail and it has but Labour should not have got rid of it so quick and they have been very disrespectful to Rwanda.
Successive goverments have promised us to sort it out and never have. It's the tax payers who suffer as ever.

I think Rwanda will get over being disrespected while they count their hundreds of millions of pounds given to them by the British taxpayer.

 

[mexico1970]

good

If they are going to be making savings on the accommodation where are the people going to live that are on there?

More importantly how much would that cost?

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

good

Aside from the salmonella issue, which wasn't acceptable, I never understood what was wrong with this accommodation. I spent quite some time in similar accommodation offshore in my early career. It was fine then and it remains fine for the thousands of British workers who continue to use such facilities in the Oil and Gas industry in UK waters and further afield.

So the question is why do you think it's not good enough for asylum seekers?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Disrespectful to Rwanda? Lol

They get millions of quid for doing nothing!

Rawanda are disrespectful motherfuckers!

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

Aside from the salmonella issue, which wasn't acceptable, I never understood what was wrong with this accommodation. I spent quite some time in similar accommodation offshore in my early career. It was fine then and it remains fine for the thousands of British workers who continue to use such facilities in the Oil and Gas industry in UK waters and further afield.

So the question is why do you think it's not good enough for asylum seekers?

I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.

 

[mexico1970]

I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.

It shouldn't be costing billions to moor a boat, now the Tories are gone couldn't they streamline the costs a bit because that's fucking excessive isn't it?

 

[PPT]

I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.

If that is the case, then reducing costs and increasing the efficiencies of this operation should be relatively straight forward?