mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Exactly how have we been disrespectful to Rwanda?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Labour Government
- Thread starter SkyBlueFlux
- Start date
BrianW
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Mar 2006
- Messages
- 5,944
- Team supported
- There's Only One City
When did the UK start worrying about being 'disrespectful' to other nations?
It's practically our trade mark.
It's practically our trade mark.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
good
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,342
I think Rwanda will get over being disrespected while they count their hundreds of millions of pounds given to them by the British taxpayer.Let's face it none of the main parties have a clue about it and more to the point I don't think they care.
The Rwanda scheme was doomed to fail and it has but Labour should not have got rid of it so quick and they have been very disrespectful to Rwanda.
Successive goverments have promised us to sort it out and never have. It's the tax payers who suffer as ever.
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
good
If they are going to be making savings on the accommodation where are the people going to live that are on there?
More importantly how much would that cost?
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2009
- Messages
- 14,866
good
Aside from the salmonella issue, which wasn't acceptable, I never understood what was wrong with this accommodation. I spent quite some time in similar accommodation offshore in my early career. It was fine then and it remains fine for the thousands of British workers who continue to use such facilities in the Oil and Gas industry in UK waters and further afield.
So the question is why do you think it's not good enough for asylum seekers?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Rawanda are disrespectful motherfuckers!Disrespectful to Rwanda? Lol
They get millions of quid for doing nothing!
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,899
- Team supported
- City
I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.Aside from the salmonella issue, which wasn't acceptable, I never understood what was wrong with this accommodation. I spent quite some time in similar accommodation offshore in my early career. It was fine then and it remains fine for the thousands of British workers who continue to use such facilities in the Oil and Gas industry in UK waters and further afield.
So the question is why do you think it's not good enough for asylum seekers?
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.
It shouldn't be costing billions to moor a boat, now the Tories are gone couldn't they streamline the costs a bit because that's fucking excessive isn't it?
P
P
PPT
Guest
If that is the case, then reducing costs and increasing the efficiencies of this operation should be relatively straight forward?I’m fairly sure that the population it can hold has been significantly increased, packing them in like sardines. But, the real reason for closing it down will be the huge cost of the operation and saving the tax payer billions, yes billions of pounds.