Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
93% of UK Muslims are not white, so it's not something we have much evidence about.What if the perp' is a white Muslim?
93% of UK Muslims are not white, so it's not something we have much evidence about.What if the perp' is a white Muslim?
If you want to die on this hill mate, knock yourself out. For the rest of us not up Starmer's arse, it is blatantly obvious what is going on, and that is that there is 2-tier policing going on all over the place, and government interference with the judiciary.So, apart from the two in Leeds, the two in Middlesbrough, the five in Birmingham and no doubt plenty of others elsewhere, it’s only white people being prosecuted and imprisoned.
Have I got that right?
We just asked for evidence and, so far, there isn’t any, barring preconceived prejudice.If you want to die on this hill mate, knock yourself out. For the rest of us not up Starmer's arse, it is blatantly obvious what is going on, and that is that there is 2-tier policing going on all over the place, and government interference with the judiciary.
That's nonsense mate. What about the fact that the police didn't turn up to that pub, or to the roundabout where they were brandishing machete's (sp?). And the copper asking if they would drop their knives off at the mosque.We just asked for evidence and, so far, there isn’t any, barring preconceived prejudice.
Your last 8 words are the pertinent ones.That's nonsense mate. What about the fact that the police didn't turn up to that pub, or to the roundabout where they were brandishing machete's (sp?). And the copper asking if they would drop their knives off at the mosque.
As I said before, it's not about specific incidents though is it. It's the playing field generally, and it does not feel at all level.
Well around 4m people at least probably agree with me since 4m voted Reform. So if this perception is wrong, don't you think it might be appropriate for someone in government to try to engage and inform and educate? I don't for one moment think they are all wrong, btw. Clearly you do, again fine with me.Your last 8 words are the pertinent ones.
The examples you gave ended up with different scenarios to how you perceived them.Well around 4m people at least probably agree with me since 4m voted Reform. So if this perception is wrong, don't you think it might be appropriate for someone in government to try to engage and inform and educate? I don't for one moment think they are all wrong, btw. Clearly you do, again fine with me.
The examples you gave ended up with different scenarios to how you perceived them.
It’s hard to persuade people with preconceived ideas that they could be wrong.
If Starmer came out and showed that all people who were involved and identified in the riots were treated the same, you’d simply not believe him.
I really think people should remember how many people in this country actually voted this time. Fact is, he is not popular.The examples you gave ended up with different scenarios to how you perceived them.
It’s hard to persuade people with preconceived ideas that they could be wrong.
If Starmer came out and showed that all people who were involved and identified in the riots were treated the same, you’d simply not believe him.
Yet he has a 5 year super majority, which also seems to have been forgotten.I really think people should remember how many people in this country actually voted this time. Fact is, he is not popular.
By 'our own people' I mean people already here by right. Not necessarily of the Volk. They could be of any race, colour or creed but they would not be immigrants. All politicians believe in a difference between British citizens and others.
Politicians of all parties refuse to discuss the matter sensibly. That's the whole problem. Having a debate free from emotion, racism and bitterness is all but impossible because people will not acknowledge reality and think we invite immigrants here as part of a WEF conspiracy or similar internet shite. When it is in fact just economic reality and the need to keep vital services working.
I've said this before. To reduce immigration you first have to have a plan. Then you have to recognise the costs of that plan and be willing to pay to fund it. There is no appetite for it because of that last clause.
It's the 'Piccadilly Gardens' argument all over again. Everyone wants the Gardens back as they were in 1958. Everyone also wants no extra cost to them in consequence. It can't be done.