I would agree with you in principle, but unfortunately I can’t look past the facts that (a) the £22bn figure is a work of fiction, constructed for political purposes, (b) a large if not majority share of the identified overspend is due to Labour’s own decisions on public sector pay and (c) the likelihood of real terms cuts in non-protected departmental spending was well signalled by the OBR months ahead of the election.
I’m afraid that Labour have been thoroughly dishonest on this matter, even to the point of manufacturing speculation of a loss of confidence in the gilt market had the WFA (and other areas of spending) not been removed. Which, on any measure, is simply not true.