The Labour Government

The Chancellor's stance doesn't fill me with confidence, reducing tarriffs on US imports before negotiations start. So we are not retaliating just seemingly rolling over. I would not have started any negotiations like that.
It seems to me that she's wangling for a trade deal of some sort or any win really on the economy. It might be an opportunity to take advantage of stupidity actually because I don't think Trump's gang really know what they're doing.
 
The Chancellor's stance doesn't fill me with confidence, reducing tarriffs on US imports before negotiations start. So we are not retaliating just seemingly rolling over. I would not have started any negotiations like that.
She'll be sacked after the local elections.

Hearing she's going to be the scapegoat for the expected labour losses to the facists.
 
Hearing from who?
Talking to a senior labour bod at a union conference.

We had a discussion about the party appeasing reform and I think it will bite them on the arse. Was told if the losses are huge to expect a drastic change of course starting with a new fiscal policy.

Why wait till then was my response to that.

They think it won't happen.

Leadership are dismissing the Reform ground game to their cost.
 
Talking to a senior labour bod at a union conference.

We had a discussion about the party appeasing reform and I think it will bite them on the arse. Was told if the losses are huge to expect a drastic change of course starting with a new fiscal policy.

Why wait till then was my response to that.

They think it won't happen.

Leadership are dismissing the Reform ground game to their cost.
It's a tough job, appeasing everyone.
 
The Chancellor's stance doesn't fill me with confidence, reducing tarriffs on US imports before negotiations start. So we are not retaliating just seemingly rolling over. I would not have started any negotiations like that.
Reducing tariffs on imported US cars from 10% to 2.5% isn’t that much of a giveaway when hardly any RHD cars are manufactured there. Most US companies manufacture their RHD cars abroad. It’s a nice easy giveaway if it opens the door to a deal on UK exports, and if it doesn’t we’ve not lost much. If the Americans were competent they’d realise this but Trump has appointed idiots who care more about sound bites than reality and if they can trumpet this giveaway as a big win it could be beneficial to us.
 
Reducing tariffs on imported US cars from 10% to 2.5% isn’t that much of a giveaway when hardly any RHD cars are manufactured there. Most US companies manufacture their RHD cars abroad. It’s a nice easy giveaway if it opens the door to a deal on UK exports, and if it doesn’t we’ve not lost much. If the Americans were competent they’d realise this but Trump has appointed idiots who care more about sound bites than reality and if they can trumpet this giveaway as a big win it could be beneficial to us.
That makes sense but where are teslas made? Arnt they made in the US?
 
She'll be sacked after the local elections.

Hearing she's going to be the scapegoat for the expected labour losses to the facists.

No way mate. Starmer doesn’t survive that.

All decisions were on his watch, and whoever he appoints (Streeting?) as his next chancellor is going to want the top job.

If Reeves goes then Starmer won’t be there this time next year. If he is stupid enough to do it then it will certainly cement the impression of a man who makes really bad choices. Of course it will be spun as him making decisive choices / being strong blah blah blah.
 
Couldn’t put it better myself .
Imagine being a people smuggler looking for clients - look the British government are getting houses ready for you !
Some might say cheaper than hotels as if that is the point .
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4632.jpeg
    IMG_4632.jpeg
    231.6 KB · Views: 26
She'll be sacked after the local elections.

Hearing she's going to be the scapegoat for the expected labour losses to the facists.

Given the seats that are up in the locals, the only story in town is likely to be Tory losses to Reform.

Polling predictions are potential losses that could easily hit 500 for the Tories, but Labour are defending so few seats that their losses will be in the 10s (and a few pollsters have predicted they could gain a few seats).
 

Attachments

  • 1745751495599.png
    1745751495599.png
    16.7 KB · Views: 11
Couldn’t put it better myself .
Imagine being a people smuggler looking for clients - look the British government are getting houses ready for you !
Some might say cheaper than hotels as if that is the point .

Something that has been going on for decades - guaranteed contracts for housing homeless people and asylum seekers is not a new policy.

As far as the people smugglers go, most of the research I've seen suggests that people wanting to come to the UK turn out to be incredibly ignorant about our benefits system, or housing situation. They're much more likely to come from countries that have English as a second language, or know that there are communities from their country already in the UK. If it was just down to housing, or benefits etc., then you wouldn't risk your life when there are plenty of other countries that offer similar, or take in a lot more refugees.
 
Something that has been going on for decades - guaranteed contracts for housing homeless people and asylum seekers is not a new policy.

As far as the people smugglers go, most of the research I've seen suggests that people wanting to come to the UK turn out to be incredibly ignorant about our benefits system, or housing situation. They're much more likely to come from countries that have English as a second language, or know that there are communities from their country already in the UK. If it was just down to housing, or benefits etc., then you wouldn't risk your life when there are plenty of other countries that offer similar, or take in a lot more refugees.
Hi Blue,
Without wanting to sound patronising, I just find that incredibly naive. I would suggest more research but you need to do more than just read statistics and articles that are usually biased one way or another.
I have lived and worked in and around some of the most ethnically diverse areas in the country for decades and I have many close friends from those ethnic groups who trust me enough to tell me the truth of how their communities function, they know my views on immigration but they know that they do not stem from racism, and in many cases our views on immigration are not very different.Talk to people, then you will really understand what is happening behind the statistics. I will give you an example.
Bangladeshis in the UK are more dependant on benefits than others in that benefits make up a greater proportion of their incomes than other groups. That is a fact, a statistic. If I didn't know better I might guess that may be because they are take up less skilled occupations etc. To a degree that is probably true.
But because I am familiar with the community, I also know this - The claiming of benefits is an industry in the Bangladeshi community, they have become expert at it. So many choose to work in the black economy in restaurants, small scale manufacture, taxis etc for cash and or part time hours on the books and then claim benefits. Their immigration lawyers are experts at it. The new arrivals are taken to the lawyers on arrival by their relatives / friends, processed through the system for maximum entitlement, lawyers are paid, relatives / friends are paid for the referral - everyone makes money ! Except the UK taxpayer of course.
To my certain knowledge many migrant communities are the same in that they have an efficient network with legal expertise to welcome new arrivals into the country and process them through the system to maximise their entitlements .
So yes, if you interview someone in the camps in Calais as to their knowledge of our benefits system then in most cases they would be short of the detail. To suggest they are ignorant is just naive, they know what they could get because those communities they belong to which as you suggest are already here will have told them about it and also told them not to worry about the detail because it will all be taken care of - they have a system.
Anyway , the point of the initial post is ....
If you have any belief at all in your ability to " Smash the gangs" why on earth would you be trying to sign up Landlords to a 5 year deal on their properties ? It will be interesting to see how many they sign up.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top