Even if she was supposed to pay it, she received expert advice to the contrary, meaning that it is justifiable and the adviser is liable.What a strange thing to drag out.
At most a £3500 potential underpayment due to a misunderstanding over capital gains tax.
The "crime" would be that she's put the wrong address down what she's applied to be an MP, so it does have some connection.Not even an MP when these alleged crimes were committed. In the grand scheme of things minute. Yet Michelle Mone still walks free. Total deflection by the Tories. Haven’t the police got more serious matters to attend to?
Yep. Seems a proverbial storm in a teacup, doesn't it? Still, diversionary tactics are expected at this desperate stage.What a strange thing to drag out.
At most a £3500 potential underpayment due to a misunderstanding over capital gains tax.
I'm an IFAa bud and work alongside our in-house chartered accountant when it comes to tax planning and mitigation for our clients. If she's had tax advice and it's wrong then the advisor is as you say to blame. However, CGT rules on property is relatively simple in my opinion and I wonder whether she had indeed taken the appropriate advice and then ignored it. In comparison to what the likes of Boris gets up to its small beer but Rayner if found to have abused the tax system does look like a moral hypocrite in most humble of opinion.Even if she was supposed to pay it, she received expert advice to the contrary, meaning that it is justifiable and the adviser is liable.
Fuck all in the big scheme of things and like many have worked out, only being used to take the heat off the Tories disgraceful time in office, all aided and abetted by the likes of the Sun and the Mail.
If proven I will call it out.
At the moment it comes across as a political attack.
Ange being found guilty would benefit Sir Keir as well as his relationship with her is a bit fractious. He'd happily fuck her off for a mate taking over as deputy.
I’m happy to see what happens as hard to have a real opinion without any evidence to support it.I'm an IFAa bud and work alongside our in-house chartered accountant when it comes to tax planning and mitigation for our clients. If she's had tax advice and it's wrong then the advisor is as you say to blame. However, CGT rules on property is relatively simple in my opinion and I wonder whether she had indeed taken the appropriate advice and then ignored it. In comparison to what the likes of Boris gets up to its small beer but Rayner if found to have abused the tax system does look like a moral hypocrite in most humble of opinion.
100% agree.I’m happy to see what happens as hard to have a real opinion without any evidence to support it.