gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I can't be arsed digging it out, and I'm not suggesting it gives me prodigious powers of prescience, but I said for some time that I had a feeling that the Tories could very well edge ahead in the final straight and secure a small majority. The economy was improving and there was (and is) a general perception (rightly or wrongly) that the Tories' economic stewardship was responsible for that. The British, or rather the English electorate, are a fairly conservative (with a small 'c') bunch especially in marginal constituencies and the main player in a first term government always stood a chance of being given the benefit of the doubt.was a surprise the size of the win but they were always going to win. i said all along i didn't believe the polls. it doesn't matter to me how it was achieved i'm just glad the British people got behind Dave. a victory for all of the people, even the cadgers.
Given a Tory victory was something I saw as less than desirable then I'm certain many Tories had the same feeling, given the capacity of many folk to confuse what we want to happen with what we think will happen. I spoke to a few Tory activists in the weeks leading up to the election and they seemed cautiously optimistic, even though they thought the party had run a pretty piss poor campaign.
To describe the outcome as a complete surprise is wrong and using Samantha Cameron's cautious removal contingency płans is a misleading piece of evidence imo. I expect that's part of the protocol in any event. Makes sense given the brutal speed at which power can change hands at the top of politics.