Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,425
- Team supported
- Manchester City
It's not the other clubs being hostile towards City , it's obviously City just being paranoid .
City progessingThe only reason those clubs will go bust is because they're spending beyond their means. Remind me what FFP was supposed to prevent again??? :-|
The problem with a percentage cap is that it benefits those with the highest revenue. Which is probably one of the factors that caused us to withdraw from the ESL as they had proposed a 55% cap on wages and net spending so if we were getting less money than United or Liverpool, then we're at an immediate disadvantage.No salary cap per individual, but as a collective
As an extreme example, KDB could be taking 50% of the allowance and the other players 50% between them
Obviously it's monitored over a period, say three years
As a suggestion the year before qualifying for Europe and the following two, if still in European competition
Which means you can spend big to get to Europe but need to budget accordingly once there, as a club would have the additional income
A socialist vision for football, what could possibly go wrong?The problem with a percentage cap is that it benefits those with the highest revenue. Which is probably one of the factors that caused us to withdraw from the ESL as they had proposed a 55% cap on wages and net spending so if we were getting less money than United or Liverpoo, then we're at an immediate disadvantage.
Whereas in the NFL for example, there's a fixed cap. Think it's $182.5m this coming season. But the NFL do revenue differently as they negotiate not just TV deals but kit deals and major commercial deals. These get shared equally among the 32 teams. There's other revenue streams, including their own local commercial deals, the food & drink concessions, parking and other things that they can keep for themselves. So there's less of a financial discrepancy between the top and lowest earning teams. But that doesn't matter as they all have to abide by the same absolute cap.
As a result, Dallas Cowboys are the highest earners by a mile and, without the cap would win the Superbowl every year. But because of the cap, they've not won it for 25 years. So I've come round to the idea of a similar system here, with central kit and commercial deals negotiated by the PL and a fixed cap.
I'd also abolish the current method of transfer fees but have clubs pay off the contract of a player they want to sign. But that payment is included in the cap (although it can be spread out over the life of the contract).
Then we really will have financial fair play.
Owners could control costs and make money. Which is what they want. That's how all this shit started, because the US owners couldn't compete with the likes of us and Chelsea.A socialist vision for football, what could possibly go wrong?
Jeez,and i thought Burnley was in the UK inbreeding capital.