The Super League | FA + PL: New Charter & Fines | UEFA: Settlement

[Pablo ZZZ Peroni]

Back on the agenda again next week:





Full article here:

Welcome to nginx 98c763ea26ab5ee112bb713bfa30ba6e!52.91.100.61

 

[halfcenturyup]

Back on the agenda again next week:





Full article here:

Welcome to nginx 98c763ea26ab5ee112bb713bfa30ba6e!52.91.100.61

A club in Dublin, you say? That's easy, the Glazers can move their franchise there under the ESL and make it easier for half their support to get to matches. Win, win.

 

[Heidenreich]

On Thursday , the Clubs will announce the Super League in a Summit.

 

[halfcenturyup]

On Thursday , the Clubs will announce the Super League in a Summit.

I am predicting there will be no Super League on Friday.

 

[jrb]

Back on the agenda again next week:





Full article here:

Welcome to nginx 98c763ea26ab5ee112bb713bfa30ba6e!52.91.100.61

Thanks.

Are Real Madrid and Barcelona including themselves In this unfair advantage?

There will be criticism of the quality of football in the current Uefa competitions including its premium Champions League; what the ESL and A22 say is the failure of Uefa’s financial fair play regulations; and the unfair advantage of state-owned clubs.

In its document the ESL rebel three say: “Uefa has close ties to certain club owners from non-member states who are commercial sponsors of certain competitions and clubs, are the main buyers of media rights for competitions operated by Uefa and who sit on Uefa’s executive committee, while chairing the ECA without any transparent election process.

“Since within the EU a club cannot benefit from state aids [sic] from its own member state … why should it be allowed that the football market be disrupted, to the exclusive benefit of a few state-owned clubs, because of state aids coming from non-member states?”

 

[halfcenturyup]

Thanks.

Are Real Madrid and Barcelona including themselves In this unfair advantage?

There will be criticism of the quality of football in the current Uefa competitions including its premium Champions League; what the ESL and A22 say is the failure of Uefa’s financial fair play regulations; and the unfair advantage of state-owned clubs.

In its document the ESL rebel three say: “Uefa has close ties to certain club owners from non-member states who are commercial sponsors of certain competitions and clubs, are the main buyers of media rights for competitions operated by Uefa and who sit on Uefa’s executive committee, while chairing the ECA without any transparent election process.

“Since within the EU a club cannot benefit from state aids [sic] from its own member state … why should it be allowed that the football market be disrupted, to the exclusive benefit of a few state-owned clubs, because of state aids coming from non-member states?”

Their arguments are just a desperate attempt to get fans behind any new proposals. They think the only thing fans didn't like was the closed-shop, permanent member proposal. I suspect they will again have misread the room, as well as what is likely to happen in the ECJ.

I particularly liked this bit:

"the ESL backers also claim that their new model will allow the creation of competitive clubs in European cities that do not currently have them – citing Luxembourg and Dublin as examples."

Whoopee doo .....

 

[HolisticJim]

Not this shit again.

 

[JPAMCR]

Their arguments are just a desperate attempt to get fans behind any new proposals. They think the only thing fans didn't like was the closed-shop, permanent member proposal. I suspect they will again have misread the room, as well as what is likely to happen in the ECJ.

I particularly liked this bit:

"the ESL backers also claim that their new model will allow the creation of competitive clubs in European cities that do not currently have them – citing Luxembourg and Dublin as examples."

Whoopee doo .....

Franchising then. Would they want 2 clubs in the same city? Rags like a tax haven so they can fuck off to Luxembourg.

 

[jrb]

Their arguments are just a desperate attempt to get fans behind any new proposals. They think the only thing fans didn't like was the closed-shop, permanent member proposal. I suspect they will again have misread the room, as well as what is likely to happen in the ECJ.

I particularly liked this bit:

"the ESL backers also claim that their new model will allow the creation of competitive clubs in European cities that do not currently have them – citing Luxembourg and Dublin as examples."

Whoopee doo .....

They’ll approach FC United next to represent Manchester.

 

[mat]

Breaking News:

Manchester City could face an immediate ban from European football. UEFA have announced that an investigation will take place over an alleged unofficial Russian sponsorship deal. The probe was instigated after a UEFA official representing Liverpool realised the club were selling Vodka at the stadiums bars.