MCFCTrick
Well-Known Member
stonerblue said:
This^^^^^^^ If these were rags, they would be long gone.....c'mon mods, flirt 'em. Let them start their own forum ffs...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Tottenham Thread (Merged)
- Thread starter mancity1
- Start date
This^^^^^^^ If these were rags, they would be long gone.....c'mon mods, flirt 'em. Let them start their own forum ffs...
Matty
Well-Known Member
At the risk of pointing out the obvious, this thread is entitled "The Tottenham Thread" so discussions of all things Tottenham within it shouldn't really come as a surprise. Add to that the fact that, in the main, the Spurs fans have been polite and informed posters and I don't really see the issue here. Ok, so they're not City fans, but so what, it adds a little diversity to the board, plus they're hardly hiding where their loyalties lie are they?
Opposing teams fans are more than welcome on Bluemoon, provided they behave appropriately. As with any board member, if they overstep the mark they'll be dealt with.
Opposing teams fans are more than welcome on Bluemoon, provided they behave appropriately. As with any board member, if they overstep the mark they'll be dealt with.
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
Matty said:At the risk of pointing out the obvious, this thread is entitled "The Tottenham Thread" so discussions of all things Tottenham within it shouldn't really come as a surprise. Add to that the fact that, in the main, the Spurs fans have been polite and informed posters and I don't really see the issue here. Ok, so they're not City fans, but so what, it adds a little diversity to the board, plus they're hardly hiding where their loyalties lie are they?
Opposing teams fans are more than welcome on Bluemoon, provided they behave appropriately. As with any board member, if they overstep the mark they'll be dealt with.
Yes, a general football forum. Not a fuckin tottenham recruiting ground for their 'ultras' (hahaha) or a place for them to boost attendances for their youth team games.
josh_spurs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 145
Look, it's a tottenham thread, which gives me a right to talk about what I wish regarding tottenham, if you don't want tottenham fans talking about tottenham related things on here, don't come on it, or dont make a thread about us. It should be a compliment for yous that we come on here as your mates have said. And he can call me an idiot but I can't call him one? And whats wrong with my name? When I joined the forum the Mods obviously didn't have an issue with my name. And when did I ever mention Harrys court trial?<br /><br />-- Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:02 pm --<br /><br />
We wouldn't be here if there wasn't a Tottenham thread and majority of fans talk sense.
Gaudino said:stonerblue said:josh_spurs said:And your problem is...?
Project fuckin tottenham ultras
Calling a Blue an 'idiot'
The fighting fucking cock
tottenham fc and its fans
Trying to get tottenham fans to go to a tottenham game via a City website
"Yids"
Your name
Arry 'lying bastrd' redknapp, and his twat of a son
A tottenham fuckin love-in on a City forum
Go back to fuckin facebook.....
This^^^^^^^ If these were rags, they would be long gone.....c'mon mods, flirt 'em. Let them start their own forum ffs...
We wouldn't be here if there wasn't a Tottenham thread and majority of fans talk sense.
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
i propose a deal:
if they beat United, they can stay. If they lose, we ban every single one of em for their team being absolutely useless when we need them to do us a favour like we did with Ade.
in all seriousness I like the Spurs contingent on here, they're generally good(a few let themselves down after the 3-2) and in all honesty I wish we could have a similar contingent from lots of clubs up and down the divisions, would be fun and interesting and would enhance the knowledge of a lot of narrow minded City fans.
we have the bluemoon and off topic sections if you don't want to increase your knowledge about footy.
The way some of our lot are upstairs and down hardly sets us up to be the shining beacon of light round here, even some comments in this thread are frankly embarrassing.
what's the fucking harm in them advertising one of their youth games on their thread? jesus wept, maybe some of you can take the hint and get down to Hyde more often if you live locally and support our kids.
if they beat United, they can stay. If they lose, we ban every single one of em for their team being absolutely useless when we need them to do us a favour like we did with Ade.
in all seriousness I like the Spurs contingent on here, they're generally good(a few let themselves down after the 3-2) and in all honesty I wish we could have a similar contingent from lots of clubs up and down the divisions, would be fun and interesting and would enhance the knowledge of a lot of narrow minded City fans.
we have the bluemoon and off topic sections if you don't want to increase your knowledge about footy.
The way some of our lot are upstairs and down hardly sets us up to be the shining beacon of light round here, even some comments in this thread are frankly embarrassing.
what's the fucking harm in them advertising one of their youth games on their thread? jesus wept, maybe some of you can take the hint and get down to Hyde more often if you live locally and support our kids.
josh_spurs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 145
JoeMercer'sWay said:i propose a deal:
if they beat United, they can stay. If they lose, we ban every single one of em for their team being absolutely useless when we need them to do us a favour like we did with Ade.
in all seriousness I like the Spurs contingent on here, they're generally good(a few let themselves down after the 3-2) and in all honesty I wish we could have a similar contingent from lots of clubs up and down the divisions, would be fun and interesting and would enhance the knowledge of a lot of narrow minded City fans.
we have the bluemoon and off topic sections if you don't want to increase your knowledge about footy.
The way some of our lot are upstairs and down hardly sets us up to be the shining beacon of light round here, even some comments in this thread are frankly embarrassing.
what's the fucking harm in them advertising one of their youth games on their thread? jesus wept, maybe some of you can take the hint and get down to Hyde more often if you live locally and support our kids.
Deal! Quality post also!
M
M
mat
Guest
bluevengence said:Where`s the media storm over Ekotto`s leg breaking assault?
i'm waiting for the blanket media coverage to begin.
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
josh_spurs said:Look, it's a tottenham thread, which gives me a right to talk about what I wish regarding tottenham, if you don't want tottenham fans talking about tottenham related things on here, don't come on it, or dont make a thread about us. It should be a compliment for yous that we come on here as your mates have said. And he can call me an idiot but I can't call him one? And whats wrong with my name? When I joined the forum the Mods obviously didn't have an issue with my name. And when did I ever mention Harrys court trial?
-- Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:02 pm --
Gaudino said:stonerblue said:Project fuckin tottenham ultras
Calling a Blue an 'idiot'
The fighting fucking cock
tottenham fc and its fans
Trying to get tottenham fans to go to a tottenham game via a City website
"Yids"
Your name
Arry 'lying bastrd' redknapp, and his twat of a son
A tottenham fuckin love-in on a City forum
Go back to fuckin facebook.....
This^^^^^^^ If these were rags, they would be long gone.....c'mon mods, flirt 'em. Let them start their own forum ffs...
We wouldn't be here if there wasn't a Tottenham thread and majority of fans talk sense.
Shouldn't you be at school?
Cheadle Blue
Well-Known Member
just announced on sky that Assou Ekotto or whatever his name is, won't face any ban..........its a joke, it really is. i seriously thought that after van persie, this would get a ban. unbelievable
josh_spurs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 145
My school uses iPads instead of school books and thankfully haven't put a lock on this.stonerblue said:josh_spurs said:Look, it's a tottenham thread, which gives me a right to talk about what I wish regarding tottenham, if you don't want tottenham fans talking about tottenham related things on here, don't come on it, or dont make a thread about us. It should be a compliment for yous that we come on here as your mates have said. And he can call me an idiot but I can't call him one? And whats wrong with my name? When I joined the forum the Mods obviously didn't have an issue with my name. And when did I ever mention Harrys court trial?
-- Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:02 pm --
Gaudino said:This^^^^^^^ If these were rags, they would be long gone.....c'mon mods, flirt 'em. Let them start their own forum ffs...
We wouldn't be here if there wasn't a Tottenham thread and majority of fans talk sense.
Shouldn't you be at school?
spurspinter1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 812
It wasn't a good challenge, it was a sort of lazy prod of the ball with most of the momentum coming from Di Santo, not that that justifies it at all. Has there been any news regarding him? Could have been a nasty one but he did walk away from it abeit gingerly.
Edit:
Apparently Probert saw it. A stupid rule I know but thats the way it is at the moment. Not sure whether he saw what could have been viewed as a stamp/kicking motion by the lad who handballed against you lot on Niko. The ref was very lenient last night.
Edit:
Apparently Probert saw it. A stupid rule I know but thats the way it is at the moment. Not sure whether he saw what could have been viewed as a stamp/kicking motion by the lad who handballed against you lot on Niko. The ref was very lenient last night.
josh_spurs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 145
To be honest, we've got lucky with Assou-Ekotto not getting a ban. Worse than Kompany's but received nothing, I can see why you's are annoyed. But its not just Benny there's been a few gone without punishment, is their anyway city could ask the FA why kompany was punished for a lesser tackle than several others?
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
josh_spurs said:To be honest, we've got lucky with Assou-Ekotto not getting a ban. Worse than Kompany's but received nothing, I can see why you's are annoyed. But its not just Benny there's been a few gone without punishment, is their anyway city could ask the FA why kompany was punished for a lesser tackle than several others?
yeah we're City and we were playing United.
josh_spurs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2011
- Messages
- 145
That's basically it! Would love a season were United dont get all the decisions and see where they end up finishing!JoeMercer'sWay said:josh_spurs said:To be honest, we've got lucky with Assou-Ekotto not getting a ban. Worse than Kompany's but received nothing, I can see why you's are annoyed. But its not just Benny there's been a few gone without punishment, is their anyway city could ask the FA why kompany was punished for a lesser tackle than several others?
yeah we're City and we were playing United.
It is a bit of a joke that just because a referee says he sees it nothing happens. The FA should be saying, you may have seen it but you are wrong, it is a bad challenge and your off to the conference for a few weeks and he's getting a ban. They soon changed the rules when they dealt with Ben Thatcher, and rightly so, but the refereee dealt with it at the time.
mike channon´s windmill
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2008
- Messages
- 7,475
Bluebee2 said:It is a bit of a joke that just because a referee says he sees it nothing happens. The FA should be saying, you may have seen it but you are wrong, it is a bad challenge and your off to the conference for a few weeks and he's getting a ban. They soon changed the rules when they dealt with Ben Thatcher, and rightly so, but the refereee dealt with it at the time.
Referees - a boys only club where they keep everything in house. Does Riley actually have the power to mete out justice to these plebs? I doubt it and it would never be used against one of their own
Fookin cowards the lot of them
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Bluebee2 said:It is a bit of a joke that just because a referee says he sees it nothing happens. The FA should be saying, you may have seen it but you are wrong, it is a bad challenge and your off to the conference for a few weeks and he's getting a ban. They soon changed the rules when they dealt with Ben Thatcher, and rightly so, but the refereee dealt with it at the time.
Exactly. The referee apparently saw Crouch's eye-gouge but didn't deem it worthy of a punishment. The FA should be hauling the ref in and asking him how the hell an eye-gouge isn't worthy of a card. Ditto with Van Persie's elbow - how the ref didn't think there was anything in that one when he had clearly lined Cuellar up is beyond me.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
josh_spurs said:To be honest, we've got lucky with Assou-Ekotto not getting a ban. Worse than Kompany's but received nothing, I can see why you's are annoyed. But its not just Benny there's been a few gone without punishment, is their anyway city could ask the FA why kompany was punished for a lesser tackle than several others?
I've not seen the Assou-Ekotto tackle yet but it sounds like it was quite a nasty one. Spurs have been on the end of some shocking decisions this season to be fair though.
The trouble now is that we're going to be looking at every challenge and judging it against Kompany's. It's quite possible that Probert didn't see the BAE tackle properly so was unsure of how bad it was but generally speaking all I want to see is a bit of consistency from refs now with regards to all 2-footed tackles. I thought we were going to get that consistency when Mike Riley last week told all refs that tackles similar to Kompany's must be punished with a red card. Then the first high-profile game following that saw Liverpool play United in the FA Cup and Maxi not even getting a yellow card for a 2 footed tackle. This despite the referee clearly seeing it and blowing up for a foul!