This transfer window/Marwood

waspish said:
Tevez City said:
Millennium said:
I know, no use of crying, but i am disappointed for not signing Eden Hazard.

Why we let him sign for Chelsea?

We wanted to not succumb to his agent greed, and I think we could have handled the matter in a better way to satisfy all parties, I think we lost a great player that could have put us at a higher level , at the same time contributed to the strengthening of a strong opponent

The strange thing is that his choice was between Chelsea & United as he mentioned after he signed for Chelsea !


Yep and reason was he thought he wouldn't get game time!

He is new to PL, give him a time to settle down and you will see his true talent.

It took Silva months to show his true abilities
 
It's a bit arrogant of some people to assume "we could have got him if we wanted" about players that sign for the opposition.

We have been beaten to other players in the past and it will happen in the future a lot. What we must do is make sure we make the correct decisions that win trophies. Chelsea's back line and United's midfield are significantly weaker than ours. That was why we won the league. That's why by the end of next week, we'll be favourites again.
 
waspish said:
Tevez City said:
Millennium said:
I know, no use of crying, but i am disappointed for not signing Eden Hazard.

Why we let him sign for Chelsea?

We wanted to not succumb to his agent greed, and I think we could have handled the matter in a better way to satisfy all parties, I think we lost a great player that could have put us at a higher level , at the same time contributed to the strengthening of a strong opponent

The strange thing is that his choice was between Chelsea & United as he mentioned after he signed for Chelsea !


Yep and reason was he thought he wouldn't get game time!

I am not sure if this was the reason.
 
Manchester1894 said:
It's a bit arrogant of some people to assume "we could have got him if we wanted" about players that sign for the opposition.

We have been beaten to other players in the past and it will happen in the future a lot. What we must do is make sure we make the correct decisions that win trophies. Chelsea's back line and United's midfield are significantly weaker than ours. That was why we won the league. That's why by the end of next week, we'll be favourites again.

Not without reinforcement, but I like your optimism though!
 
MSP said:
CityCTID said:
MSP said:
One more time - Fletcher was on peanuts at Wolves and will be on little bit more than peanuts at Sunderland. That gives Sunderland the space to pay bigger transfer fee.

Johsnon was on reportedly 80k wage, I've heard no Real Madrid or Barcelona were after him so City does not have a space to sell him for big transfer fee as Sunderland is not rich enough team to meet that kind of wages.

Why0s that so hard to configure.. it's not only about fees when transfers are being made, wages are as much (if not more) important.

Adebayor would be gone like 2 years ago for 15-20 millions if he was not on huge wages. Same with Bridge, same with RSC. It's not easy to offload City players if big clubs are not after them.

Adam Johnson: Also was on peanuts Only signed a new five-year lucrative contract (signed by Marwood btw) in January! Why? of course we will struggle to find a buyer and decent fee due to his high wage (approved by Marwood) ....... good job? Right!

that was crap thing to do, I agree

If we don't renew contracts and pay the going rate, then we'll find ourselves in the same boat as Arsenal with players being able to call the shots.

Doesn't always work out the way we'd like it.
 
moomba said:
MSP said:
CityCTID said:
Adam Johnson: Also was on peanuts Only signed a new five-year lucrative contract (signed by Marwood btw) in January! Why? of course we will struggle to find a buyer and decent fee due to his high wage (approved by Marwood) ....... good job? Right!

that was crap thing to do, I agree

If we don't renew contracts and pay the going rate, then we'll find ourselves in the same boat as Arsenal with players being able to call the shots.

Doesn't always work out the way we'd like it.

that assumes that you want to renew the contract

sometimes the brave decision is not to bow to player power
 
Silt fail at it again

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2193642/Roberto-Mancini-quit-Manchester-City-lack-signings.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nings.html</a>

And coming on talk sport now
 
Chorleyblue said:
Silt fail at it again

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2193642/Roberto-Mancini-quit-Manchester-City-lack-signings.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nings.html</a>

And coming on talk sport now

Was expecting this.

Watch out if PSG stumble. Not saying that Daily Mail is ITK, but it's not exactly inconceivable after what happened at Inter, not to mention his problems with Marwood.
 
Chorleyblue said:
Silt fail at it again

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2193642/Roberto-Mancini-quit-Manchester-City-lack-signings.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nings.html</a>

And coming on talk sport now

talk shite!! must be true then lol
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.