ULEZ Letter

Which supports a policy like ULEZ, which is designed to get rid of older polluting cars more quickly, doesn't it?

Well it’s not doing a very good job at that is it by taking money from people who then can’t use it to buy a cleaner, newer car.

I’d also suggest the increasing revenues from it also says it’s not working if what you say is to be believed?

It’s not believable btw, I’m just playing along here.
 
If it's only going to affect about 2% of car drivers and factor in more and more going electric - then why has he bothered to bring this in at all?

Because the number of very polluting cars entering London has dropped from 35,000 a day to 12,000 a day over the decade since it's come in, the amount of NOx pollution in the City has nearly halved, and we want to do everything we can to get non-compliant cars off the roads ASAP because they put out about 4x as many pollutants as a modern (ie post-2006) car.

The taxpayer shells out £3.7Bn a year for treatment of pollution related illnesses to Londoners every year.

Before this latest expansion, over 75% of residents were in favour. Expanding it is always controversial, but when the 98% of drivers who are unaffected realise they're unaffected and it makes them less like to die from cancer, they'll support it again.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.