United Thread 2014/15

Status
Not open for further replies.
mat said:
Good to know Nike are consistent when it comes to shit kits.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/transfers/manchester-united-201415-shirt-unveiled-the-kit-louis-van-gaals-men-will-wear-next-season-9589261.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foot ... 89261.html</a>
[bigimg]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Br77i_JCEAQ-IhY.png[/bigimg]

With all the debate about white shorts and blue shorts, it's surprising that Nike didn't take the opportunity to put the rags in a darker short this season, if only for Darren Fletcher's benefit.
 
They're not happy about Holland going out and Argentina going through. You could almost say they're quite bitter about it.
 
inchy14 said:
I'm With Stupid said:
Galatasaray have just said that Sneijder has a £16m release clause. Can see them going for that tbh. Not a bad price. He's still only 30 years old, so they'd get a good few years out of him. I'd have him at City if we weren't already overstocked in that department.

Why?

So he could chase after the ref screaming abuse when he doesn't get everything given to him?

He's another smacked arse arrogant c**t and will belong at the swamp.

Very reminiscent of Bryan Riggs in that area.
 
I'm With Stupid said:
mancity dan said:
Why would Adidas pay more than double for the Rags sponsorship than they do for Real Madrid and Bayern Munich?
More importantly than that, why would they pay £15m more than the price that Nike have (very publicly) rejected? It's all over the papers that £60m is the price the rags want, and their main rival for the deal has pulled out. So the Adidas CEOs are going to look at that situation and offer more? That'd be the worst bit of business since the rags paid £4m more than the release clause for Fellaini.

and the fellani deal was the worst piece of business since the rags paid 7m for bebe.
 
Seems like Evra wants to leave.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/28231138" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/28231138</a>

Another rat leaving the sinking ship?

Shaw thrown in at the deep end?
 
I'm With Stupid said:
mancity dan said:
Why would Adidas pay more than double for the Rags sponsorship than they do for Real Madrid and Bayern Munich?
More importantly than that, why would they pay £15m more than the price that Nike have (very publicly) rejected? It's all over the papers that £60m is the price the rags want, and their main rival for the deal has pulled out. So the Adidas CEOs are going to look at that situation and offer more? That'd be the worst bit of business since the rags paid £4m more than the release clause for Fellaini.

maybe, but perhaps after missing out on Le Arse, and knowing that Warrior would pay close to that kind of money to make a statement, it puts Adidas in a difficult position, and I don't really see how Nike can call the bluff because I think someone will pay close to that amount.
 
stony said:
They're not happy about Holland going out and Argentina going through. You could almost say they're quite bitter about it.


Strange really. A few years ago they would often chant, "Argentina, Argentina".

Fickle bunch.
 
Manc in London said:
stony said:
They're not happy about Holland going out and Argentina going through. You could almost say they're quite bitter about it.


Strange really. A few years ago they would often chant, "Argentina, Argentina".

Fickle bunch.

Nothing strange about them, they're not only the most fickle bunch around, but the most arrogant, despicable set of supporters in football. I have mates who are reds, but my god, each and everyone of them has a face you could go at with a brick, time and time again, you can spot the Utd fan in a crowded room, just by looking at the arrogant twats.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.