Valencia in for Negredo?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sky Blue said:
uwe rosler 28 said:
Marvin said:
Stupid comment even by my standards

Can't play the European games (he was the one being dropped) and he wanted to go And injured

The window opens less than 12 weeks after he would be able to play

Its stupid to not replace him not sell him lets see how many sell outs we've had by jan 4/5 tops!

You've posted some shite today....but at least you've stopped double posting shite!

Its my opinion pal I don't agree with everything you say but its your opinion and I stand by my comment that its stupid to not replace him. And I've been to the 2 home games and stoke was nowhere near full and I can see the other games being like that apart from the big games!
 
RandomJ said:
Chris in London said:
Fap fap fap fap fap.

Fap fap fap.


Fap fap fap fap fap. Fap fap fap. Fap fap.








Fap.

Just seen the jennifer lawrence pics?
Those pics are a major let down. I thought she had a tidy body with nice round tits and an nice big arse but she hasn't at all. Not much to her body at all really.
 
karen7 said:
Everytime sergio get a knock or pulls up i will be flapping like crazy,stupid decision not to replace him,i thought txiki was smarter than this

I absolutely hate this love in people have for Txiki. We don't know the bloke,he's paid to do a job. Sometimes he will come up with the goods,other times not but people act like he is the second coming.
 
Andouble said:
Opens room for a potential monster signing next summer, no room for anyone new in the squad anyway. Fine with this.

You won't be saying that if we pick up a few injuries.
Fuck next summer-This season has just started.
 
and we do have 3 decent youth players who can fill some gaps, obviously not a patch on Negredo but could take the pressure off a little if injuries did bite.
 
RandomJ said:
Lancet Fluke said:
MihaiCity said:
how the fuck is he a key player???? dzeko aguero and jovetic are all ahead of him ...good player for us yes key?? no way not even close

He is a key player because (as has been said a million times) Aguero and Jovetic's recent injury records are awful and we play two up front.

And he scored 23 goals for us. That is 23 goals we have just lost from the team and not being replaced.

It's not like we'll play with 10 men in the matches Negredo was supposed to play...
 
bluechampion7891 said:
Tron Coltrane said:
city91 said:
If there is a £20+ million obligatory clause in the loan deal then I think its a great deal for the club.

It doesn't really matter whether we get a replacement this window as we could always switch to a 4-2-3-1 formation like we played under Mancini. Personally I think that would be our strongest formation which will allow us to accommodate Fern, Nando and Yaya.

If we can end the window with a net spend of below £10 million considering the players we have brought in then it will be a fantastic window. Next summer is when we can really take the shackles off and no team will be able to outbid us for our targets.

Its the same every summer in that genuine world class talent becomes available. This season it was Di Maria and the season before was Ozil. Next season will be no different and when Reus or whoever is after a new challenge, we will be able to go balls deep after them. Where as the likes of Arsenal and United will still be feeling the effects of spending fortunes on the likes of Mata and Ozil and not getting the expected return from them.

Just responding to say I'm with you. Seems like the consensus is that our executives have lost their minds and this is a dark day in City's history. If Richards & Nasty find last-minute homes we're going to finish this summer with a transfer profit. And if you look at our 22 players I can't see how it's not a stronger squad, better suited to fight on all fronts, than last season's (even with Negredo's exit). And the reality of FFP is that every penny saved is a penny that can go toward someone like Reus in another window. If we're that screwed in January -- without the one month of football that Negredo would've been able to play, coming back from injury -- then we go out and plug the hole. I just don't see this as the sky falling, like some others have taken to viewing it.

21 - unless you are either counting of sinclar, guidetti, Wright. And I wont even count mapard, his legs are gone so basically we are 4 injuries away from not being able to name a full bench

Right, but we had 21 regardless until late November/early December waiting for Negredo to heal. So either Iheanacho gets his permit, slots in famously, and we don't need to buy, or he doesn't and we survive 3/4 weeks of football playing 4-5-1 or having been fortunate with no new major injuries. In exchange we get £20-23.8m for a homesick player who turns 30 next year and wants to go home, who spent the last four healthy months with a barren spell in front of net.

Again, I'd love to keep Negredo. But I think the view that City are screwing the supporters and acting outside the club's best interest are rash at best. They know more than we do, and even without exercising that leap of faith I think it's easy to see how it might help the club. Teams in the NBA spend years trying to line up their ability to spend with marquee players contract expirations... we don't know that there isn't a plan here, and we don't know that something better might come out of it. I'm just not ready to freak out over losing a 4th-choice striker for four weeks of eligible play just yet.
 
ono said:
This isn't needless flapping. I would be just as concerned had we only had 3 centre backs.

Seems to me we have been trying to shift Nastasic which would basically leave us with 3 reasonable centre backs. Fortunately looks like Nastasic has decided to stay.
 
Marvin said:
LoveCity said:
We've basically gone from having a 10/10 strike force compared to United's 6/10 strike force to both having an 8/10 strike force in one day. Aguero is more talented than Falcao, but Falcao scores for fun. Jovetic/Dzeko vs. Van Persie/Rooney, not much between them I guess. Well done City.
Undeniably we have gone backwards, but sometimes you have to take a backwards step to go forwards.

Even if there were no UEFA sanctions I would not pay Falcao £346k pw unless I knew he had fully recovered from his knee op and even then?

Forget what Manure are doing Marvin there is no reason why we have to go backwards full stop.

We had to get rid of Richards and we all know Guidetti , Sinclair , Barry , Lescott and Garcia ( given Euro constraints ) have/had no future at the club.

Getting rid of Negredo especially on loan is a step backwards with no upside.

Replace with better yes if he is adamant he wants to go because of his family as otherwise he would definitely want to stay but not the way this can only end unless we keep him until January at least and even then we lose YAYA for too long as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.