kaz7
Well-Known Member
Where was the offside lines and wtf are they doing giving pens for dives , it is a contact sport , enough to bring you down or nothing , thought it would sort the cheating out
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR - 2020/21
- Thread starter kaz7
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Why wasnt Salah dive looked at by VAR ?
Because its Anfield, Its Livarpool, its Salah, its Olivar, its against us and because they don't fucking care who knows what game they are playing any longer.
They cant even be arsed to show us what's offside and what isn't at the shithole.
Any match you watch has some clown drawing lines as the offside is forensically examined, unless City are playing liarpool. Souness, the liarpool pundit said Salah dived... No one else did. I thought var was meant to stop cheating. The words corrupt and cheating spring to mind
jimmygrimblesboots
Well-Known Member
They didnt take much time over Stones's goal , he was actually onside , it was Dias slightly in front disgraceful from Sky if that had been Dippers in that situation they would have been a ten minutes delay and squiggly lines bent conveniently to allow a Dipper goal
They didnt take much time over Stones's goal , he was actually onside , it was Dias slightly in front disgraceful from Sky if that had been Dippers in that situation they would have been a ten minutes delay and squiggly lines bent conveniently to allow a Dipper goal
The next 2 days would have been filled with the injustice of it all as well.
Sky are in league with the Var mob. Sky cannot show re runs when var want to rule it out as it would make the decision look stupid. Corruption at its finest, fortunately we could beat them without itThey didnt take much time over Stones's goal , he was actually onside , it was Dias slightly in front disgraceful from Sky if that had been Dippers in that situation they would have been a ten minutes delay and squiggly lines bent conveniently to allow a Dipper goal
James Morgan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2017
- Messages
- 546
Thankfully with the way both teams played today, VAR was made redundant. We can take positives from that, and we only need to concentrate on our game and the rest should take care of itself.
Blueknows
Well-Known Member
Funny how you never see a var review /replay at anfield or the swampAny match you watch has some clown drawing lines as the offside is forensically examined, unless City are playing liarpool. Souness, the liarpool pundit said Salah dived... No one else did. I thought var was meant to stop cheating. The words corrupt and cheating spring to mind
Sky are in league with the Var mob. Sky cannot show re runs when var want to rule it out as it would make the decision look stupid. Corruption at its finest, fortunately we could beat them without it
Sky/BT have full real time access to the conversations between officials and VAR and as you rightly say, they are fully involved in the illusions being created and the cover up jobs needed.
Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
Its actually made it worse. The refs look for ‘contact’ even though as you correctly point out ... ITS A CONTACT SPORT!!!Where was the offside lines and wtf are they doing giving pens for dives , it is a contact sport , enough to bring you down or nothing , thought it would sort the cheating out
- Status
- Not open for further replies.