kinkladze10
Well-Known Member
Was Stones offside? One quick review what's all that about?
It's called a cover up, a cover up for corruption.Was Stones offside? One quick review what's all that about?
Agree about hearing the officials conversations. However its worse than that. Offside is always shown. Even if its for the Bamford offside which was just his sleeve offside. Unless its for us and they need to find a reason to disallow a goal. Then all of a sudden it just doesn't appear.The offside was very fishy. If there was some transparency and we could hear the conversations we could put some of this to bed. You know, like you can in every other sport. But not football. Wonder why?
Like to see that hammer blue cnt on here telling us it has prevented diving andd cut out mistakes. I really hate that fckr for supporting the thing that has killed the game for me. Mind you, half of Blue Moon seems to be up his arse, so what do I know....?
4-1 todayIs that abuse really necessary?
would you call someone face to face that just because they have a different opinion?
Are you only happy if everyone on a forum just shouts in a echo chamber of ‘fuck VAR’ ‘it’s killing the game’ ‘corrupt bullshit, I’m never watching again ‘ Is that the only opinions allowed or you get called a c*nt.
I’ve gave perfectly reasonable and honest views on VAR and have stated countless times I’m not a ‘lover’ of it and it’s far from perfect over and over again. But I do stick by that I don’t want refs making blind decisions and if they can get help in seeing decisions they missed then that makes a lot of sense.
Mike dean is rightly getting absolute pelters by everyone - because he is getting decisions wrong despite having the chances of watching replays of the incident, I’d much rather that then the fact he could have hid behind the fact that’s what he saw in a split second.
It’s not VAR that got the decisions incorrect, it’s the crap refs that still deem it to be red despite seeing the replays.
YouGov poll :
- 8 per cent want to keep using VAR as it is used now.
- 74 per cent say keep using VAR, but change the ways it is used.
- 15 per cent want to stop using VAR entirely
I’m in the 74% and you’re in the 15% , you must hate a lot of people supporting this ‘killing of the game’ anyhow , I’m sure you still think what I deem as a fairly balanced view means I’m some FA fan boy c*nt or something.
hey ho and well done stuffing the reds earlier.
Is that abuse really necessary?
would you call someone face to face that just because they have a different opinion?
Are you only happy if everyone on a forum just shouts in a echo chamber of ‘fuck VAR’ ‘it’s killing the game’ ‘corrupt bullshit, I’m never watching again ‘ Is that the only opinions allowed or you get called a c*nt.
I’ve gave perfectly reasonable and honest views on VAR and have stated countless times I’m not a ‘lover’ of it and it’s far from perfect over and over again. But I do stick by that I don’t want refs making blind decisions and if they can get help in seeing decisions they missed then that makes a lot of sense.
Mike dean is rightly getting absolute pelters by everyone - because he is getting decisions wrong despite having the chances of watching replays of the incident, I’d much rather that then the fact he could have hid behind the fact that’s what he saw in a split second.
It’s not VAR that got the decisions incorrect, it’s the crap refs that still deem it to be red despite seeing the replays.
YouGov poll :
- 8 per cent want to keep using VAR as it is used now.
- 74 per cent say keep using VAR, but change the ways it is used.
- 15 per cent want to stop using VAR entirely
I’m in the 74% and you’re in the 15% , you must hate a lot of people supporting this ‘killing of the game’.
either way I try and give a honest and balanced view and happy to debate with anyone in a nice manner, never take it personal. It’s probably why half the forum is ‘up my arse’
but guess you still think I’m some FA fan boy c*nt or something.
hey ho and well done stuffing the reds earlier.
Love to see the figures for match going fans v TV viewersOver half of fans surveyed by YouGov thought it had “done badly” with nearly 2/3rds saying it made the game less enjoyable
VAR: YouGov survey finds 51 per cent of fans say video referral system has 'done badly'
Percentage of fans rating VAR as making the game less enjoyable down from 67 to 63 per centwww.google.co.uk
Yes me too. 4800 people polled. They had to have watched regularly either on TV or in a ground. Would be good to see future iterations of the poll split the 2 out.Love to see the figures for match going fans v TV viewers