Hart of the Matter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 5,180
Another none review of penalty incident in Villa Arsenal match. Peter Walton talking absolute bollocks. He boils my piss.
Smoke and Mirrors, as they say.So according to Walton, the point of VAR is to correct obvious errors not get the decision right. Surely if the decision is wrong then it is an obvious error?????????????
Exactly. Its complete bull$hit. An obvious error to one person, is not to another. Totally ambiguous and guess which side always ends up benefitting from this.So according to Walton, the point of VAR is to correct obvious errors not get the decision right. Surely if the decision is wrong then it is an obvious error?????????????
More like a bunch of shithouses ..![]()
Jamie Redknapp: Mike Dean decision to send off West Ham's Tomas Soucek genuinely worrying
West Ham midfielder Tomas Soucek was sent off during draw at Fulham for elbow on Aleksandar Mitrovic; Red card was for violent conduct, despite minimal intent; Soucek faces a three-match ban; David Moyes embarrassed for referee Mike Dean; Fulham boss Scott Parker: Game is going sterilewww-skysports-com.cdn.ampproject.org
Just seen this, nothing in it a clear accident, no malice, no intent.
Blame the ref and VAR, yes but the other player going down like he has been pole axed didnt help.
I dont class myself as a hard man but compared to a lot of footballers I'm well ard !!
Why wasnt Salah dive looked at by VAR ?
They didnt take much time over Stones's goal , he was actually onside , it was Dias slightly in front disgraceful from Sky if that had been Dippers in that situation they would have been a ten minutes delay and squiggly lines bent conveniently to allow a Dipper goal
Sky are in league with the Var mob. Sky cannot show re runs when var want to rule it out as it would make the decision look stupid. Corruption at its finest, fortunately we could beat them without itThey didnt take much time over Stones's goal , he was actually onside , it was Dias slightly in front disgraceful from Sky if that had been Dippers in that situation they would have been a ten minutes delay and squiggly lines bent conveniently to allow a Dipper goal
Funny how you never see a var review /replay at anfield or the swampAny match you watch has some clown drawing lines as the offside is forensically examined, unless City are playing liarpool. Souness, the liarpool pundit said Salah dived... No one else did. I thought var was meant to stop cheating. The words corrupt and cheating spring to mind
Sky are in league with the Var mob. Sky cannot show re runs when var want to rule it out as it would make the decision look stupid. Corruption at its finest, fortunately we could beat them without it
Its actually made it worse. The refs look for ‘contact’ even though as you correctly point out ... ITS A CONTACT SPORT!!!Where was the offside lines and wtf are they doing giving pens for dives , it is a contact sport , enough to bring you down or nothing , thought it would sort the cheating out