Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Jogged my memory it’s to do with the ball and its sensor technology the UCL ball provider Adidas has patterned technology that they won’t share with the Nike the PL ball supplier
VAR Discussion Thread | 2024/25
- Thread starter SebastianBlue
- Start date
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
Fair enough.
All applied globally where the infrastructure and money are available, then. Is there any reason why FIFA, UEFA and the big leagues in Europe, for example, shouldn't use the same guidelines and systems?
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
Ah, yes. Money. I should have guessed.
Stephen230
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 8,917
- Team supported
- MCFC
I suppose it’s that FIFA oversee the game globally, but they don’t dictate every detail that all competitions should adhere to.
Similar to why all competitions aren’t required to use the same football or pitches must have identical dimensions I suppose.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 14,916
Possibly. A bit weak, though imho.
The whole sport needs better administrators at every level..
TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 38,386
- Team supported
- Manchester City
He did and gave the penalty citing Ederson blocked a clear goalscoring opportunity.
The bent twat.
The referee may miss something or even make a genuine mistake, at this point Var can step in and ensure the mistake is rectified.
On the other hand, the referee can see a foul and take the necessary action. Var can review it and decide he has made the correct decision.
Unless it's a decision against the red shite, at this point, some unknown panel will fuck over the referee and Var and tell the world they were incompetent.
But only when it's the red shite
On the other hand, the referee can see a foul and take the necessary action. Var can review it and decide he has made the correct decision.
Unless it's a decision against the red shite, at this point, some unknown panel will fuck over the referee and Var and tell the world they were incompetent.
But only when it's the red shite
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 20,421
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I don't understand the appeal. How many time does an incident need looking at ?
1st Ref said red card
2nd VAR said red card
3rd AP no red card.
How can both the on field ref and VAR get it wrong ?
Surly this outcome would mean severe action against the on field ref and VAR. They both have fucked up and could of effected the outcome of the game.
Obviously I'm being sarcastic ! We know why it was over turned.
How much longer can football carry on with this clear cheating in favour of rags ?
Two football lunge/stamp should have been a red card, above the ball tackle red card than AP reduce it to yellow. 75million quid deal to avoid ffp, it stinks
1st Ref said red card
2nd VAR said red card
3rd AP no red card.
How can both the on field ref and VAR get it wrong ?
Surly this outcome would mean severe action against the on field ref and VAR. They both have fucked up and could of effected the outcome of the game.
Obviously I'm being sarcastic ! We know why it was over turned.
How much longer can football carry on with this clear cheating in favour of rags ?
Two football lunge/stamp should have been a red card, above the ball tackle red card than AP reduce it to yellow. 75million quid deal to avoid ffp, it stinks
The whole shit tip needs cleaning up
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
Forest have received a huge fine for criticising crap VAR decisions and implying Atwell showed bias as a Luton fan.
www.bbc.co.uk
Nottingham Forest fined £750,000 for Stuart Attwell 'VAR is a Luton fan' social media post
Nottingham Forest are found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute for their comments about match officials in last season's 2-0 loss at Everton.
www.bbc.co.uk
Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 6,398
- Team supported
- City
Watch the VAR protocols in the RL Final.Forest have received a huge fine for criticising crap VAR decisions and implying Atwell showed bias as a Luton fan.
Nottingham Forest fined £750,000 for Stuart Attwell 'VAR is a Luton fan' social media post
Nottingham Forest are found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute for their comments about match officials in last season's 2-0 loss at Everton.
All crystal clear, quick and open. No dispute.
As per cricket & tennis.
What have PIGMOL/FA/PL/Sky got to hide ??
Corruption in plain sight !!
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
Calls in tennis tend not to be subjective so VAR is easy. Cricket less so but there are still a lot of straightforward decisions. Football is a lot trickier particularly relating to handball where the interpretation seems to change week by week.
As for fouls, we still have too many instances of fouls in the box not being awarded with commentators and pundits saying "that would be a foul anywhere else on the pitch", a distinction not made anywhere in the laws of the game.
I accept these microphone jockeys are rarely qualified refs, but I think we've all seen and thought the same thing when watching games.
Gone for a Burton
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2022
- Messages
- 6,398
- Team supported
- City
The decision process should be live in stadium and on TV.
For as long as they're not suspicion will rightly continue.
Complete transparency !!
kaz7
Well-Known Member
They dont like it up em do they , i am convinced they have something to hide and they use us , mainly, as their cashpoint , i wish we could take pigmol downForest have received a huge fine for criticising crap VAR decisions and implying Atwell showed bias as a Luton fan.
Nottingham Forest fined £750,000 for Stuart Attwell 'VAR is a Luton fan' social media post
Nottingham Forest are found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute for their comments about match officials in last season's 2-0 loss at Everton.
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
I agree with complete transparency but I believe the bigger problem is consistency. Offside in one game is onside in another. That could be reduced with semi-automatic offsides but would still leave the "interfering with an opponent" aspect open to interpretation.
Handball decisions must be judged more systematically and there should now be sufficient examples from every angle for greater consistency to be achieved. Every time you see a defender running with his hands behind his back to avoid a potential handball call is an indication that those who apply the laws don't have a clue about human movement. As for defenders trying to jump with their hands by their sides......
If they had said Atwell is a fucking shitface cheat, would that have been more acceptable?Forest have received a huge fine for criticising crap VAR decisions and implying Atwell showed bias as a Luton fan.
Nottingham Forest fined £750,000 for Stuart Attwell 'VAR is a Luton fan' social media post
Nottingham Forest are found guilty of bringing the game into disrepute for their comments about match officials in last season's 2-0 loss at Everton.
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
He's just incompetent. A great referee, but nobody knows in which sport.
They could probably have questioned his interpretation of the laws, but to suggest cheating is to cross a line. However if he really supports Luton then you have to question why he was on VAR if Luton could benefit from an Everton victory.