Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
@pigeonho has left the chat!Heard it all now, United never got screens as they predicted VAR was coming
- -
@franksinatra has left the chat!
- -
@Terrycooke has joined the chat!
@pigeonho has left the chat!Heard it all now, United never got screens as they predicted VAR was coming
I thought VAR was based on Rugby where the Ref is miked up so everyone can hear and understand his reasoning i believe this is how Rugby`s Refs earned their respect, I watched enough of VAR in Europe over the weekend to know it does not workTo be fair though, they have no more idea what's going on than you do in the stadium, they are only watching their own replays, but they have no idea what is being said off camera, and until everyone, fans in the stadium, fans on TV, and the TV commentary team can hear it, itsbentnot very transparent.
Forget the transparency it's being used incorrectly to start with as wrong decisions are still being given. Why weren't we given a penalty when Nmecha was fouled last night? I am not sure why the ref didn't give in the first place but then VAR said no pen when if you look it's a clear shove with the elbow into the rib/back area, not shoulder to shoulder.People aren't "against it", people are against how its being used, ie with no transparency.
Mods feel free to move it to a var thread if there is one .
Is VAR going to be used in the fa cup final ?. Wembley isn't a premiership ground so I guess not. But a premiership team uses it as their home ground so it is !. And if spurs make the final it will be used as it's their home ground. If two other teams make the final it isn't their home ground so it won't be used !!
Is this just another cock up by the fa , I mean how can you have two matches being played at the same time played under different rules in the same competition
Mods feel free to move it to a var thread if there is one .
Is VAR going to be used in the fa cup final ?. Wembley isn't a premiership ground so I guess not. But a premiership team uses it as their home ground so it is !. And if spurs make the final it will be used as it's their home ground. If two other teams make the final it isn't their home ground so it won't be used !!
Is this just another cock up by the fa , I mean how can you have two matches being played at the same time played under different rules in the same competition
They have the audio available with Rugby, why not for Football?? It would give the impression of impartiality, no hiding for the officials. Put it on a big screen and let the fans see it too. There will always be doubters, but as long as there’s complete transparency it should be accepted. There will always be the odd fcuk up, but there are so many camera angles, there shouldn’t be any doubt.
There will be no hiding for the sly cnuts then.
So you’ve got no issue with the technology, just its application?Has been, is, and will be an absolute disaster
Mainly due to the absence of transparency and refusal to air dialogue of decision makers by the sport’s governing bodies
You have to wonder why that might be...
So you’ve got no issue with the technology, just its application?
That's exactly why they go along with it, they can do whatever they want, and are then backed by the same idiots in the studio/caravan/headquarters. Its not "on the level", if it was, then the already miked up refs would be telling those in the stadium why a decision is being looked at, they don't want it, nor does the FA, because they FA/refs can create the outcome they want/are asked for.I'm surprised that the referees go along with the way they're being told to use it. If I was a ref, I'd want the process to be like it is in other sports. That way I would be seen and heard to be on the level. I wouldn't want all this secrecy around the process. It casts doubt on their integrity. They've had scandals in Italy and Germany. I'd want to be above suspicion.