richardtheref
Well-Known Member
It doesn't state headbutting is a red card offence. Perhaps Livarpool can try an appeal on that basis.Where in the laws of the game does it specify hair pulling is a red card offence ?
It doesn't state headbutting is a red card offence. Perhaps Livarpool can try an appeal on that basis.Where in the laws of the game does it specify hair pulling is a red card offence ?
Slight edit.You are being far to harsh. He's said he was sorry, I think we should all just forget about it now.
Poor Mike Dean, everyone forgets he was forced into the var job, he didn't want it you know. He wanted to be a lumberjack.
You have to ask yourself what the communication between Dean and Taylor was like? "There was nothing in it, he just pulled him to the ground by his hair". "Oh, OK then. Play on".The main worry is that at the time Dean didn't believe hair pulling came under the "violent conduct" law. Now he has supposedly been one of our top 2-3 refs for over 20 years. It beggars belief. Until he actually went home and read the law he had no idea an infringement had occurred. Yet he has not only been tasked with improving how VAR is used but is also training other officials how to use it.
fucking hell Mark, if you pull a player to the ground when the ball is nowhere near its violent conduct!! If he pulled him down by his ears we’d say it was so why not his hair? In fact if he had short hair we’d be saying it was, it’s just he’s got ‘girly’ long hair so that’s ok ….Where in the laws of the game does it specify hair pulling is a red card offence ?
It doesn’t and you won’t find biting or eye gouging or many other violent acts specifically mentioned. That is the point you are missing or being awkward about.
A violent act is a red card offence, whatever form it takes and the fact our supposed Top Ref didn’t recognise hair pulling as a violent act is staggering.
It doesn't state headbutting is a red card offence. Perhaps Livarpool can try an appeal on that basis.
fucking hell Mark, if you pull a player to the ground when the ball is nowhere near its violent conduct!! If he pulled him down by his ears we’d say it was so why not his hair? In fact if he had short hair we’d be saying it was, it’s just he’s got ‘girly’ long hair so that’s ok ….
Grabbing any player should be violent conduct, it’s not supposed to be allowed.
'Being awkward about' is the key phrase here.It doesn’t and you won’t find biting or eye gouging or many other violent acts specifically mentioned. That is the point you are missing or being awkward about.
A violent act is a red card offence, whatever form it takes and the fact our supposed Top Ref didn’t recognise hair pulling as a violent act is staggering.