Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,229
Guessing = making a judgement call.They are still guessing when the pass was made.
Yes.
Guessing = making a judgement call.They are still guessing when the pass was made.
This is exactly what I have been trying to say but some on here don't want to accept that offsides are not "factual" How can you explain that the rashford goal was given but the Isak one was disallowed. Of the 2 the Isak goal seems more legitimate. All this "tolerance" and thicker/thinner/red/blue/green lines (take your pick) suggest to me that they can get the outcome that suits VAR. The sooner this bunch are miked up or replaced by robots the better!I think the Rashford goal brought into light a new “it’s within tolerance” that many of us had never heard. This looked closer.
It’s gone from factual to err not quite factual & back to factual.
YupMulti billion pound industry using cheating cunts to make decisions and 50 quid cameras resulting in subjective decisions.
It's guess work when the pass was made, even more so when running at a paltry 50fps.
I have already explained why the way offside is determined by VAR is not “factual”.That isn’t true. They are factual based on the cameras they work with.
Perfectly put!I have already explained why the way offside is determined by VAR is not “factual”.
Two people, assessing the same incident, using the current system, with it’s many limitations, can arrive at two different determinations (offside/onside).
That, by it’s very nature, means it is a subjective decision.
Again, the “fact” of whether the player was offside or onside exists. But that is unfortunately independent of the subjective determination made by VAR.
This is not a matter of opinion; it is—ironically—a fact.
Conte being a bit naive - We've learnt how to use it alright.But the marginal decisions always seem to favour the favourite 2.
Can you recall a marginal decision going against Liverpool? I cant
Conte said last night that England need to learn how to use Var ! How many years has it been in and we still, in his opinion, don't know how to use it.
Use a sledgehammer, it might penetrate better.I have already explained why the way offside is determined by VAR is not “factual”.
Two people, assessing the same incident, using the current system, with it’s many limitations, can arrive at two different determinations (offside/onside).
That, by it’s very nature, means it is a subjective decision, regardless of your stance on whether VAR is or is not used to manipulate match outcomes.
Again, the “fact” of whether the player was offside or onside exists. But that is unfortunately independent of the subjective determination made by VAR.
This is not a matter of opinion; it is—ironically—a fact, so I am not sure why people are still trying to claim that VAR offside determinations are factual.