Ntini77
Well-Known Member
Considering our Argentinian contingent, wouldn't Marcelo Bielsa come into contention?
Ntini77 said:Considering our Argentinian contingent, wouldn't Marcelo Bielsa come into contention?
BillyShears said:Danamy said:The black and white of it is if Mourinho doesn't come Mancini stays............in my humble opinion.
If it's Mourinho or bust for our owners, then I'd be hugely disappointed. There's nothing remotely forward thinking about that appointment and it doesn't take into account the very real possibility that Mancini would leave of his own volition whilst Mourinho ends up staying at Real.
tolmie's hairdoo said:Danamy said:BillyShears said:As I said earlier, I think there's zero chance of Mancini getting sacked, even if we finish a distant second behind the rags (which is unlikely). The only conceivable way I can see Mancini not staying beyond the summer is if he's not offered a new contract, and someone like Juve or even the Italian national team come calling.
In terms of managers out there - I'm pretty surprised Pep hasn't signed a new contract at Barca. For me the obvious candidates are him and Mourinho. Wenger is never going to happen. Klopp is unlikely because he's just signed a new contract at Dortmund. Maybe Jogi Loew.
I think the manner/timing of Mancini's exit will have a massive bearing on who his successor is.
I'll repeat myself in what i posted yesterday that i'm not sure Guardiola would be a step up from Mancini to be honest, he's not proven in the Prem and would be a huge gamble.
I think Tolm is right that when the time comes it'll be a proven Prem manager with a pedigree, Hiddink is busy counting his money and Mourinho is getting very busy at the moment.
The black and white of it is if Mourinho doesn't come Mancini stays............in my humble opinion.
You've not been hacking my phone again, have you mate? ;)
I'd say adug did their forward thinking when they committed half a billion to transfer fees and contracts, billy. Im sure if a successor is appointed his remit will be immediate success with the squad he inherits.BillyShears said:Danamy said:The black and white of it is if Mourinho doesn't come Mancini stays............in my humble opinion.
If it's Mourinho or bust for our owners, then I'd be hugely disappointed. There's nothing remotely forward thinking about that appointment and it doesn't take into account the very real possibility that Mancini would leave of his own volition whilst Mourinho ends up staying at Real.
Didsbury Dave said:BillyShears said:Danamy said:The black and white of it is if Mourinho doesn't come Mancini stays............in my humble opinion.
If it's Mourinho or bust for our owners, then I'd be hugely disappointed. There's nothing remotely forward thinking about that appointment and it doesn't take into account the very real possibility that Mancini would leave of his own volition whilst Mourinho ends up staying at Real.
I'd say adug did their forward thinking when they committed half a billion to transfer fees and contracts, billy. Im sure if a successor is appointed his remit will be immediate success with the squad he inherits.
I think most people agree that if we finish potless and Jose is available, it's a simple choice. The two less predictable scenarios are if one of those two things don't happen.
Rammy Blue said:Pretty sure I posted about it earlier in the thread, but the one aspect that still troubles me is the "it was my fault / poor preperation" line being spun out again by Bob.
Not sure what everyone else's opinion is on the matter but for me I thought it was poor form from Bob - I'm sure people will point to the "protecting the players" line however imo it's about time the players stood up to the task and pulled their fingers out anyway.
Can't see the board being overly impressed with the manager of their business spinning out the same excuse twice in a matter of weeks.
Rammy Blue said:Pretty sure I posted about it earlier in the thread, but the one aspect that still troubles me is the "it was my fault / poor preparation" line being spun out again by Bob.
Not sure what everyone else's opinion is on the matter but for me I thought it was poor form from Bob - I'm sure people will point to the "protecting the players" line however imo it's about time the players stood up to the task and pulled their fingers out anyway.
Can't see the board being overly impressed with the manager of their business spinning out the same excuse twice in a matter of weeks.
TFC said:Rammy Blue said:Pretty sure I posted about it earlier in the thread, but the one aspect that still troubles me is the "it was my fault / poor preperation" line being spun out again by Bob.
Not sure what everyone else's opinion is on the matter but for me I thought it was poor form from Bob - I'm sure people will point to the "protecting the players" line however imo it's about time the players stood up to the task and pulled their fingers out anyway.
Can't see the board being overly impressed with the manager of their business spinning out the same excuse twice in a matter of weeks.
I'm with you mate, theres no room for 'poor preparation' at this level of the game, especially with the talent at our disposal.
citizens_1976 said:Rammy Blue said:Pretty sure I posted about it earlier in the thread, but the one aspect that still troubles me is the "it was my fault / poor preparation" line being spun out again by Bob.
Not sure what everyone else's opinion is on the matter but for me I thought it was poor form from Bob - I'm sure people will point to the "protecting the players" line however imo it's about time the players stood up to the task and pulled their fingers out anyway.
Can't see the board being overly impressed with the manager of their business spinning out the same excuse twice in a matter of weeks.
Have some faith and loyalty. We are Man City, we don't want to emulate those over the road in any sort of way. United gave Fergie time and look at him now. Mancini will be the best manager in our history- 110%!