Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:Wretched Vengeance said:That was mostly rubbish. Belgium never turned up.
They needed a powerhouse in midfield and what they got was BogBrush.
True. Their defensive shape was excellent, it's partially why Belgium looked so inept. I think demichelis' organizational skills helped hugely.sam-caddick said:Demichelis should have played from the start of the tournament, Argentina look miles better defensively with him included.
lancs blue said:Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:Wretched Vengeance said:That was mostly rubbish. Belgium never turned up.
They needed a powerhouse in midfield and what they got was BogBrush.
They also needed vision but Hazard once again failed to show up for a big match, another flat track bully and I'm so glad now that he knocked us back,
lancs blue said:Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:Wretched Vengeance said:That was mostly rubbish. Belgium never turned up.
They needed a powerhouse in midfield and what they got was BogBrush.
They also needed vision but Hazard once again failed to show up for a big match, another flat track bully and I'm so glad now that he knocked us back,
B\connellblue said:When the Belgium players get a chance to reflect on todays performance they'll probably think to themselves "Oh my God we never fucking showed up at all"! To a man they didn't leave everything out there and well as he played, as captain Vinny should have drove them forward more not hoofed it Wimbledon style.
France, great winners? The way I remember it, they were a dreary side with an incredible defence, who won most of their games with goals from their defenders? I was young though so I could be mistakenrobbieh said:B\connellblue said:When the Belgium players get a chance to reflect on todays performance they'll probably think to themselves "Oh my God we never fucking showed up at all"! To a man they didn't leave everything out there and well as he played, as captain Vinny should have drove them forward more not hoofed it Wimbledon style.
It was at times like watching a PL game between 2 not very good sides. In fact my take on the tournament is it has been very exciting but overall very poor quality. i can't name one team that has looked particularly good.
In all previous world cups there have been quality teams. they may not have won, think Brazil 82, France 86, Italy 90 and there also have been great winners too like Spain and France but can anyone hand on heart recommend any of the teams who are still in it.
robbieh said:B\connellblue said:When the Belgium players get a chance to reflect on todays performance they'll probably think to themselves "Oh my God we never fucking showed up at all"! To a man they didn't leave everything out there and well as he played, as captain Vinny should have drove them forward more not hoofed it Wimbledon style.
It was at times like watching a PL game between 2 not very good sides. In fact my take on the tournament is it has been very exciting but overall very poor quality. i can't name one team that has looked particularly good.
In all previous world cups there have been quality teams. they may not have won, think Brazil 82, France 86, Italy 90 and there also have been great winners too like Spain and France but can anyone hand on heart recommend any of the teams who are still in it.