CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

The sooner the club’s lawyers sue a journalist for defamation, and cause the meany mouthed fucker to have to sell their house to pay the damages the better. Someone like stone, conn, roan, harries, delooney, Ogden, ronay. It might stop the others
 
Burtonblue said:
I’m certain the club have already been onto it, hence the change in the headline.
We’re not going to keep taking it anymore...
Click to expand...

It took them until 10PM at night to change the headline, same with the Mail.

At this point they aren't the main headlines and the majority of people who clicked on the site today would think City are cheats who got off on a technicality.

The rags showed the way to do it in the 90's and 00's, ban them and they change their tune and wouldn't dare criticise the club.
 
nmc said:
David Conn should be issued with a writ. He’s basically saying CAS were corrupt and City’s nominee had a conflict of interest. CAS make a ruling thar Conn doesn’t like so the prick calls foul.
Click to expand...
Conn's piece is disgusting and he's burned any bridges he may have had, both with City and with me. I'm going to go to town on him as well tomorrow. He's clearly being told what to write, whereas I always thought he had integrity, even if I didn't agree with him.
 
The Clansman said:
Which is why I can't see City wasting time and effort on these so called "journalists". Going after them would be counter productive and give them the opportunity to play the down trodden victim. Besides, they would still write their filth even if they were banned. From City's perspective, the game plan continues; we can still attract the top talent, attract the best sponsors/investors and play the best football. And nothing that Harris, Conn et al can write or tweet can change that now.
Click to expand...
Part of me agrees with you, they would only frame it as City being enemies of free speech so it would be counter-productive and only serve to feed their delusional self-importance and whistle-blowing fantasies. It would become a weird badge of honour for some genuinely damaged individuals.
However, our laissez faire policy to challenging the media has clearly failed thus far. Perhaps making an example of a few select individuals, hitting them fast and hitting them extremely hard, wouldn’t be the worst thing in terms of halting this groundswell of embittered bile. We have already seen off one bunch of biased frauds in UEFA and the G14. Taking a couple of openly hostile liars to the bankruptcy courts would be a piece of piss in comparison
​
 
Last edited:
I fucking hate Delaney. Out of 93 pages, he chose to tweet about the thing where CAS agrees that we failed to co-operate. Hope his wife now tweets that she cheats on him because he has a small dick.
 
hcblue95 said:
This has probably been covered on here, but after Roan changed his stance slightly, daily mail have also changed theirs to 'overwhelmingly exonerated '. Club are clearly fighting back, just wish they'd go after the likes of the WhatsApp group and others.
Click to expand...

I don't think Roan wrote the original article.

Pieces in Roan's name have been solid all evening, starting with tweets, and with the part under his name on the BBC page.

The top part was significantly rewritten, and Roan's stuff added.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Conn's piece is disgusting and he's burned any bridges he may have had, both with City and with me. I'm going to go to town on him as well tomorrow. He's clearly being told what to write, whereas I always thought he had integrity, even if I didn't agree with him.
Click to expand...
Go to town on him where and how Colin? Can I hold your coat while you do it?
 
I was a nervous wreck for a couple of days leading up to the verdict. It was like a weight was lifted when the notification announcing we had won landed

As many said in the days prior to the verdict, all that mattered is that we were found not guilty because we knew that in eyes of most of our haters we would be cheats whatever happened

And predictably that is what’s happening which means I don’t give a shit what is in the report

We’re innocent so just laugh at all the hatred, jealousy and piss boiling.. and let City and their lawyers deal with those that overstep the mark
 
Ancoats blue said:
I wouldn't think so .... the fine amount is paltry when compared to the possible cash prize earned from a likely two seasons in the Champions League .
Click to expand...

‘Tis galling though that the money will go straight in the pockets of our rivals, some of whom were behind this whole farce anyway.
 
BringBackSwales said:
Go to town on him where and how Colin? Can I hold your coat while you do it?
Click to expand...
On Twitter. But why we let these rancid, lying fuckers wander around the Etihad unchallenged is beyond me. I'm certainly not advocating violence but we should given them a "guard of dishonour" when they walk into the stadium in future. They should learn that words have consequences.
 
LongsightM13 said:
Part of me agrees with you, they would only frame it as City being enemies of free speech so it would be counter-productive and only serve to feed their delusional self-importance and whistle-blowing fantasies. It would become a weird badge of honour for some genuinely damaged individuals.
However, our laissez faire policy to challenging the media has clearly failed thus far. Perhaps making an example of a few select individuals, hitting them fast and hitting them extremely hard, wouldn’t be the worst thing in terms of halting this groundswell of embittered bile. We have already seen of one bunch of biased frauds in UEFA and the G14. Taking a couple of openly hostile liars to the bankruptcy courts would be a piece of piss in comparison
​
Click to expand...
In that case, Conn would be a bloody good start!
 
Don Karleone said:
EeBdoAOWkAETQk1
Click to expand...
Might try and get that as a screensaver.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
On Twitter. But why we let these rancid, lying fuckers wander around the Etihad unchallenged is beyond me. I'm certainly not advocating violence but we should given them a "guard of dishonour" when they walk into the stadium in future. They should learn that words have consequences.
Click to expand...
Is there any appetite to make an example of some of them on matches and presser days and ban them?
 
In
Prestwich_Blue said:
Conn's piece is disgusting and he's burned any bridges he may have had, both with City and with me. I'm going to go to town on him as well tomorrow. He's clearly being told what to write, whereas I always thought he had integrity, even if I didn't agree with him.
Click to expand...
Integrity? That went out the window many years ago, mate.
 
is it any wonder we didnt co-operate , Laterme was leaking info to the media at every opportunity , and probably recieving a nice little earner at the same time , so why would we give this failed politician any more ammunition.
UEFA has been proven to be corrupt from to top to bottom they are just whipping boys for the G14 and Hateful eight , if we did win the Champs league i would refuse to collect the trophy , the embarrasment it would cause UEFA and Ceferin would be insurmountable.
Its a joke competition , were a team that can finish 4th twenty five points behind the Champions and then lose half a dozen games and still make the final, the winners of this trophy are not the best club in europe , they are invariably the luckiest club in europe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top