COVID-19 — Coronavirus

Status
Not open for further replies.
the population density of Stockholm is 5012 per square km, whereas London is 5590 per square km. I think you have to look at the density of these areas if you want to make this type of comparison.

Stockholm is a tiny city compared to London, and only part of it as as densely populated as the whole of Greater London. There aren't more than one or two other areas that compare to our Urban areas. Vast swathes of Britain are as densely populated as the outskirts of Stockholm.

I'd find a map but this is about as useful as I can give you.

13783864983_7d1e3772aa_o.png
 
GM scoreboard

Manchester 340 - up from 312. 14678 cases. 2431 in week. Pop score up 61 to enter 2600 club at 2655. Weekly Pop 440

Wigan 229 - up from 188. Real concern how far Wigan has fallen. 6518 cases. 1445 in week. Pop score up 69 to 1983. Weekly Pop 439. Could overtake Manchester tomorrow as worst in GM which was unimaginable in August when it was 1 or 2 cases a day.

Oldham 188 - up from 116. 6412 cases. 975 in week. Pop score up 79 to enter the 2700 club at 2704. Weekly Pop 411.

Bolton 178 - up from 162. 7171 cases. 1094 in week. Pop score up 62 to 2494. Weekly Pop 381.

Salford 167 - up from 155. 5558 cases. 1097 in week. Pop score up 64 to enter the 2100 club at 2147. Weekly Pop 423.

Tameside 151 - up from 104. 4805 cases. 805 in week. Pop score up 67 to enter 2100 club at 2122. Weekly Pop 356.

Rochdale 148 - up from 121. 5580 cases. 972 in week. Pop score up 67 to enter 2500 club at 2509. Weekly Pop 437. Also close to overtaking Manchester here.

Trafford 129 - up from 108. 4249 cases. 795 in week. Pop score up 54 to 1790. Weekly Pop 335.

Stockport 118 - up from 95. 4691 cases. 841 in week, Pop score up 41 to 1599. Lead on Trafford now 191 here. Weekly Pop 287.

Bury 113 - up from 92. 4366 cases. 760 in week. Best in GM. Pop score up 59 to 2286, Weekly Pop 398.
 
Burnham is a snake.
Putting a party political point scoring effort before the lives of the residents of Greater Manchester.

like I said yesterday you have a party screaming for a stronger lockdown across the country whilst denying it to those in most need of a lockdown, the irony is lost on some of the blind on this thread

Will be interesting to see if we don't go to tier 3 and it figures improve more than Liverpool who did. That's probably Boris worst nightmare at the moment and would definitely see more people lose faith in the lockdowns. For that reason alone I think he will force is into it.
 
Thanks...

Country........CV19 Deaths as a % of total pop.

Norway.........0.005%
Finland.........0.006%
Germany.......0.011%
Denmark.......0.012%
France.........0.051%
Sweden........0.058%
Italy............0.060%
UK..............0.065%
Spain...........0.072%

Sweden not the best but certainly not the worst, their benefit is they never crippled their economy to get here and they have a clear identifiable area that the messed up on, Care Homes.
people who can only see Covid as an issue will never grasp the issue of having a crippled economy. In a couple of years time they will no doubt be the first to moan that taxes have been raised and benefits cut.
 
Other data around the UK today. Merseysde had a worse day than GM did.

Liverpool had 467 cases. Well over Manchester again.

In the past week it has totalled 3369 cases v Manchester's 2431. And its Pop score has risen to 677 v Manchester's 440. At a pop score today of 2846 Liverpool in just 10 days it has gone from below much of GM to be above everywhere in GM.

Only its Merseyside neighbour Knowsley has one higher. It added 157 cases today that increased its pop score as a small borough by 104 (highest in UK today) to become the first place in Britain to have a Pop score pass 3000 at 3051. It has had fewer cases than Stockport over the pandemic which shows you how few it is expected to have on the per 100,000 measure. It is the most infected place in England right now. And with Liverpool and Sefton in the top 10 Merseyside has clear problems.

Only Manchester is in there from GM and at number 10 after falling down that list from number one during the big student testing numbers a week or two ago. It will likely not be in the top 10 next week and only Wigan might sneak in from GM as it stands.

Things could change - and numbers did rise in GM today (though so did everywhere in the NW). But Merseyside is right now significantly more of a concern than GM in terms of case numbers.

Though relative to other parts of the UK - south and east especially - both are up there.
 
This table suggests different to your view...

There are only four countries that have a current lower death rate per 100,000 than Sweden. Sweden are at the same figure as Germany 0.3. It is an interesting read.

We have a population roughly six times the size of Sweden we have had over six times as many cases and seven times as many deaths.


EU/EEA and the UKSum of CasesSum of Deaths14-day cumulative number of COVID-19 cases per 100 00014-day cumulative number of COVID-19 deaths per 100 000
Spain936 560 33 775312.43.6
France834 770 33 303365.81.7
United_Kingdom689 257 43 429333.31.7
Italy391 611 36 427118.80.8
Germany356 387 9 76771.60.3
Netherlands211 690 6 699485.51.6
Belgium202 058 10 359637.62.8
Romania172 516 5 749208.74.3
Czechia160 112 1 283770.55.5
Poland157 608 3 440162.82.3
Sweden103 200 5 91885.30.3
Portugal95 902 2 149181.21.6
Austria62 455 901172.31.1
Ireland47 427 1 841211.30.8
Hungary44 816 1 109154.53.0
Denmark34 441 67794.90.4
Bulgaria28 505 958102.41.7
Slovakia26 300 71269.40.3
Greece24 450 49047.60.9
Croatia23 665 345159.61.3
Norway16 136 27837.30.1
Finland13 133 35153.10.1
Slovenia11 520 153260.30.6
Luxembourg10 471 133287.01.3
Lithuania7 041 11274.60.7
Malta4 282 45231.61.6
Estonia4 017 6838.50.2
Iceland3 929 11313.70.3
Latvia3 204 4265.60.2
Cyprus2 379 2567.40.3
Liechtenstein195 1192.80.0
Total4680037 199909

Christ.

Your table proves that larger countries have higher death rates.

Fuck me, what a surprise.

And looking at just the last 14 days? Jesus, that's weak.

Now. Try again, total per capita deaths.

I first thought you were just thick. Now it's obvious you're dishonest.
 
I think the difference between Sweden and the UK is more to do with household size than population density. In Stockholm 40% of households are single occupancy, in Gothenburg it's over 50%.

The big mesage in Sweden is if you're ill - stay at home.

When people who live on their own stay at home then the transmission chain is broken. So the effective R number is pushed down.

This is probably especially significant in cities where, in the UK, many single people are still going to be in shared housing. In Stockholm the areas that were hardets hit in the spring were areas and communities where multigeneration homes are more common. The Somali and Syrian communities, for example.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.