bluemoon32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 27,265
- Team supported
- City
City have backed the wrong horse here. Idiotic.
that should be the end of that
Yeah, more rest for the players. Internationals do my head in anyway ;-)Good
Thats what it look like to me too. I wonder if we’ll also see owners locking out players if they don’t make enough money and want to drive salaries down.I'm surprised so many on here think the 55:100 limit on wage/transfer spending:turnover is primarily designed to hurt City. It's about making football more like US sports, which have a wage cap, and ultimately protecting owners' profits!
Strong but this could all be for show. The premier normally bend to the will of the rags and the dippers.strong statement. Hope the american owner shut it down now .
Disappointing by city
I’ll consider this my resignation of attending football games.
I'm surprised so many on here think the 55:100 limit on wage/transfer spending:turnover is primarily designed to hurt City. It's about making football more like US sports, which have a wage cap, and ultimately protecting owners' profits!
So far we are not part of it. Let’s juts for now fling mud at the rest of the jumping rats from the shipI think you're misunderstanding.
The story is not that City haven't been offered a place, its not that City won't sign up eventually, its that they haven't done it yet and everyone else has.
If this were ever going to go ahead, City would 100% become a founding member, anyone who thinks otherwise is incredibly naive. This is right up Soriano's alley, the only problems they will have are the "financial responsibility board" etc.