r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
1 goal in 5 meaning they didn’t qualify for the Euros or World Cup.
tbh I actually thought his international record was worse than it is.
Just looked on wiki say`s 12 apps 7 goals
1 goal in 5 meaning they didn’t qualify for the Euros or World Cup.
tbh I actually thought his international record was worse than it is.
Harry Kane will be a City player come end of the transfer window. Now crawl back under your rock son and keep crying about Haaland who was never ever signing for this club.Prematurely full of shit, as usual.
Have we signed him then, has he posed with tixi the pen and hd up the shirt? Has he fuck.
Jorginho was all sorted before he went on his holiday. Alves. Koulibaly nailed on. Sanchez too. You can't honestly think this is done at this stage, some groundwork maybe but the tough part is yet to start.
He may well end up here before the window shuts, and if the club wanted it, great. But to preach it is done is so daft. It will be months later and rejection after rejection and media claim after media claim before it happens, if it does. And possibly do the rounds to other targets before circling back.
With what chance would he have scored?Haaland would have scored today in this England team. He has more pace than the Kane and that’s what we need for City
His last 5Just looked on wiki say`s 12 apps 7 goals
Haaland would have scored today in this England team. He has more pace than the Kane and that’s what we need for City
Harry Kane will be a City player come end of the transfer window. Now crawl back under your rock son and keep crying about Haaland who was never ever signing for this club.
Hahahaha.
I think his pace would have given us more options on the counter which would have opened up the game more for Foden and Sterling. Not one specific chance Kane didn’t convertWith what chance would he have scored?
Shame he’s NorwegianHaaland would have scored today in this England team. He has more pace than the Kane and that’s what we need for City
Ok. Lukaku might have helped England more but who cares, we don’t play like England, we have the ball most of the time so we don’t need Kane trying to chase the long punts and we play mostly in cold weatherLukaku would imo.
He wouldn't have spent the whole match trying to be a number 10.
He would have given us a focal point and, and may well have actually had a shot in the game.
Also he wouldn't have given the ball away as often and probably would have made a bit more of some of England's long punts forward.
He's also probably better suited to playing in the heat and he has more pace to try and get in behind.
I just answered his question.Ok. Lukaku might have helped England more but who cares, we don’t play like England, we have the ball most of the time so we don’t need Kane trying to chase the long punts and we play mostly in cold weather
LmaoHaaland would have scored today in this England team. He has more pace than the Kane and that’s what we need for City
Rag ;A good first post mate. Let’s see lots more.
He’s 30yr old and on 800k a week, oh and not very good.All this talk of strikers suiting us, I actually think Griezmann is a better fit. Excellent link up play, very mobile and quality finisher.
And given all this Barca stuff, he's a player we could swap for Laporte.
Didn't know his salary. Age immaterial, he'll be playing long after Kane's body has packed up.Not very good? Gets selected for the most talent packed team in Europe.He’s 30yr old and on 800k a week, oh and not very good.
Are you a full shilling?
So does Giroud.Didn't know his salary. Age immaterial, he'll be playing long after Kane's body has packed up.Not very good? Gets selected for the most talent packed team in Europe.
He can do it on a wet wednesday night in StokeOk. Lukaku might have helped England more but who cares, we don’t play like England, we have the ball most of the time so we don’t need Kane trying to chase the long punts and we play mostly in cold weather
Yes, but on a slightly bigger game...He can do it on a wet wednesday night in Stoke