Rather than Tarquins direct their anger at our football club perhaps they should look closer to home , Xhaka got sent off in the 5-0 defeat at the Etihad and then gifts us a penalty in the return game and their idiotic centre back gets two bookings in ninety seconds , brainless.
On you tube it has Ostergaard`s post match interview, he claims Ederson caught him on the shin which clearly did not happen, but talksport are adamant that it did?
No real difference from football then, where VAR look without being asked?
It’s a shame he hasn’t been a big success like £100m Sancho and £100m Lukaku, who obviously wouldn’t be mentioned
Ostegaard hast been at the Goons long and his comments will ingratiate him with the down trodden Tarquins , if he spoke the truth , it was 50/50 and he caught my boot whilst playing the ball , he would be tarred and feathered , transfer listed and sent the same way as their other heroes Ozil & Aubaymayeng.
You forgot £100m Pogba but he's only had 5 years to win anything of any significance , so probably old news.
Or £80m Maguire whose best days on Blackpool beach are behind him
The rail will actually make it safer, ironic.
I think VAR is definitely here to stay. How I envisaged VAR working on its introduction, was to give the referee another opportunity to see a major Incident he was unsure of. If for instance the only outside interference was for offside and the on pitch referee was left to do the rest. For the penalty incidents yesterday he could of gone to the monitor to give himself a second look at something that happens a great speed in normal play. I may have missed some but I can't remember to many since it's introduction were the referee has been asked to have another look and then not changed his mind. I thought that one of the things that VAR would assist with would be a great reduction in diving for penalties, but it seems more prevalent now than before VAR. What seems to happen now is either the ref gives a really soft penalty (dive) and VAR doesn't get involved because it's not clear and obvious, or the referee doesn't give it and VAR does get involved because of the slightest of touches, tell the referee to have a second look and then he gives it. To sum up VAR is not the problem PIGMOL are the problem and the organisation needs a top to bottom overall.
And the fact we’re a ‘proper club’!
I’d say slightly different because in rugby league if the ref doesn’t ask it doesn’t get looked at a Mille football, where VAR can ask the ref to have another look. Not sure about union.
The "u" in all those types of word were artificially added in English to make it more sophisticated. There were two eras when this happened: Elizabethan times where the court wanted to appear more "continentale" and Victorian times when educationalists were obsessed with such matters. "Color" etc was traditional spelling this side of the pond. You would need a lexicographer to date each change correctly. Calling Susie Dent.
Gdm is very big in the legal system, all those pies and ale
Social media, eh?
which then goes back to my previous question that if he doesn't ask, it doesn't get reviewed, so he can still get it wrong
Not to mention City fans getting to the Emirates early doors NYD and going suitably bonkers at the goal. So soulless.
