flb
Well-Known Member
So how do spurs fit into that then? What made them one of the "original" big five at the onset of the PL-a club with an almost similar track record in honours, who last won the title in 1961-8 seasons before City's in68-69, and a fanbase virtually the same? City were disgracefully mis managed for over 20 years with Swales and Francis Lee, it seems that City's history has been airbrushed from the records and be forever labelled the third tier club that got lucky, and just for your info in case you didn't know, City had bigger average attendances than Arsenal in the 70's. It seems that history only started at the onset of the PL. Listen, I've no issue with Arsenal whatsoever, its the sense of self entitlement that's staggering, the facts show that City have the worlds best manager and recruitment strategy, with actual figures that show our nett spend to be 11th in the PL.Call them sky sports originals then. The clubs at the top end when Sky made the Premier League global
Last edited:
