Centurions
Well-Known Member
Bollocks.Grealish clearly moved his hand upwards onto the ball though...
Bollocks.Grealish clearly moved his hand upwards onto the ball though...
You’re missing the point. Its never given in a million years at the other end. Thats the issueA poorly reffed match with us up against 12, or even 13.
That said, now I'm calmer I've no big problem with the handball. I don't think it should be handball, but the way the vast majority of English games have been reffed this season that gets given.
If it had happened at the other end and not been given, we'd all have been fuming.
Glad that united haven't got the excuse that they would have had if it hadn't been given also.
Only thing about that decision for me is that I'm fairly sure if that happened the CL it wouldn't get given. The refs there seem to still use a little common sense, which ours don't seem to either have or want to use. It's mental how English matches are referred so differently to European ones.
You’re missing the point. Its never given in a million years at the other end. Thats the issue
So why didn't his right arm also flick upwards? I agree with the second part 100%Watch it in normal speed it’s natural movement! That’s what the referee should look at first watch it in normal play then in slow motion!
One thing for Certain at the other end Coote wouldn’t have brought it to the referees attention!
Grealish clearly moved his hand upwards onto the ball though...
it did though, but hit their player on the way back up.So why didn't his right arm also flick upwards? I agree with the second part 100%
Yup that's how I see it. They've obfuscated the decision making process soooo much now that they can now give anything for everything and get away with it.Nobody in their right mind should be appealing for a penalty for that, and nobody in their right mind should be over-ruling the referee for it.
People need to stop buying this "they had to give it" argument. With the rules as they are I can make that argument either way on almost any handball or offside decision.
Seriously, there were three major VAR reviews there and each of them ended up with the wrong decision. Don't talk to me about interpretations or protocols. Those are part of the problem, not of any solution.
No he didn't, he was jumping for a header and would have exactly the same movements if the ball hadnt hit his arm. He wasnt even looking at the ball so impossible for him to move his arm to the ball.
What do some people watch….
This is an example of what you describe. A player looking at the ball and moving his arm deliberately towards it and playing it. No penalty
Why did you not include the phrase 'deliberately touches', which is the main condition of the offence you referred to?First line "moving the hand/arm towards the ball". Grealish moved his hand upwards, and it hit the ball.
They wouldn't recommend the ref to look as in the view of VARed David Coote it only merited a yellow To me it was borderline and the ref clearly didn't see it as he gave his team a free kick so, VARed should have asked him to take a lookRegarding their penalty, we were awarded an equally soft one vs Leipzig in the CL, so it's not a surprise that it was given
After the VAR intervention the TV camera focused on Webb the Red and he really looked like he was struggling to contain his glee. The way he squirmed he may even have cum in his knickers
the stamp on Akanji I really don't understand what went on as this was a clear and obvious error from the referee to give utd the free kick
It was 50/50 yellow or red, so surely VAR should have instructed the ref to review it
As for the KDB penalty claim, by this time we all knew what was going on
Thats what happens when you jump, stretching to head it while twisting in the air. You can never have played the game or have a basic understanding of the mechanics of it…H
He was already coming back down after the jump, both of his arms were moving downwards, and then his left arm flicks upwards. It's not a consequence of the jump.
I really dont think so. tbh I think most people make their mind up on what the pundits or the media say (And we all know they hate City) but tbh Jenas immediately called that out as not handball. So did the studio, so do even some utd fans.A poorly reffed match with us up against 12, or even 13.
That said, now I'm calmer I've no big problem with the handball. I don't think it should be handball, but the way the vast majority of English games have been reffed this season that gets given.
If it had happened at the other end and not been given, we'd all have been fuming.
Glad that united haven't got the excuse that they would have had if it hadn't been given also.
Only thing about that decision for me is that I'm fairly sure if that happened the CL it wouldn't get given. The refs there seem to still use a little common sense, which ours don't seem to either have or want to use. It's mental how English matches are referred so differently to European ones.
This is the only conclusion that adds up. It's absolutely infuriating what's so blatantly happening with no redress.I have come to the conclusion that refs KNOW they are fouls but just don't want to give them.
The fact that its a subjective decision, there was no clear and obvious error that the VAR had to over-rule. Complete incompetence or just cheating.Ball to hand is not a pen when you know nothing about it
I'm going for cheating shev.The fact that its a subjective decision, there was no clear and obvious error that the VAR had to over-rule. Complete incompetence or just cheating.
Both this and the Casemiro tackle on Akanji were looked at by Coote on VAR but he deemed there was no clear and obvious error by Tierney so no further action was taken.